SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.38 issue3How primary and secondary appraisals of daily stressful events influence negative and positive affectDetecting underreport in real-world assessment contexts: the utility of multiple-scale indicators author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Anales de Psicología

On-line version ISSN 1695-2294Print version ISSN 0212-9728

Abstract

SERRANO-IBANEZ, Elena R et al. The role of affect in pacing: an experimental study. Anal. Psicol. [online]. 2022, vol.38, n.3, pp.546-554.  Epub Oct 16, 2023. ISSN 1695-2294.  https://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.502021.

People with chronic pain often change the way they carry out their daily activities according to different patterns, among which are pacing strategies. Cross-sectional studies on the association between pacing and affect show contradictory results. The study aim was to experimentally test whether the induction of positive affect vs negative affect would influence the choice of the type of pacing (pacing to increase productivity or pacing to reduce pain) when the participants were exposed to pain, while controlling for the variables optimism and catastrophism. The study participants comprised a sample of 145 undergraduates. The results of multinomial logistic regression showed that there was no association between the variables. Pacing is an intervention strategy in all chronic pain intervention models, and thus it is relevant to continue investigating the role of affect in relation to pacing.

Keywords : Positive Affect; Negative Affect; Optimism; Catastrophism; Pacing; Pain.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English | Spanish     · English ( pdf ) | Spanish ( pdf )