SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.22 issue5Work satisfaction among Spanish nurses working in English hospitalsSpanish politicians discourse about the responses to violence against women author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Gaceta Sanitaria

Print version ISSN 0213-9111

Abstract

LARRANAGA, Isabel et al. Impact of informal caregiving on caregivers' health and quality of life: analysis of gender inequalities. Gac Sanit [online]. 2008, vol.22, n.5, pp.443-450. ISSN 0213-9111.

Objectives: To describe informal caregivers' characteristics, quantify the effect of caregiving activities on caregivers' health, and determine whether this effect differs by sex. Methods: A descriptive study was carried out based on the Basque Health Survey 2002. Physical and mental health, use of health services, social health and health related quality of life (HRQL) indicators were compared in caregivers (n = 836) and non-caregivers (n = 5,706). Age-adjusted logistic regression models were calculated to assess the association between the caregiver and effects on health by sex, socioeconomic position and occupational status. Results: Female caregivers showed worse results in 6 out of 10 indicators compared with non-caregiver women, whereas male caregivers showed worse results in only four indicators compared with non-caregiving men. The associations between caregiving (caregiving vs. non-caregiving) and health results were stronger in women than in men, except in social health. When caregiving burden intensity was considered, greatly burdened men showed a similar or higher risk of poor HRQL (physical in men: OR = 3.0, CI95%: 1.4-6.3; women: OR = 2.3, CI95%: 1.5-3.5; mental in men: OR = 2.5, CI95%: 1.4-4.3; women: OR = 2.5, CI95%: 1.7-3.7) and low social support (affective support in men: OR = 2.6, CI95%: 1.5-4.6; women: OR = 1.5, CI95%: 1.0-2.3). However, the risk of sedentariness, lack of sleep, greater use of health services and mental ill-health remained higher for women caregivers. Conclusions: Caregiving damages the health of informal caregivers but the risks for female caregivers are higher due to greater intensity of caregiver burden. As men's caregiving burden increases, gender inequalities decrease or invert.

Keywords : Informal care; Gender inequalities; Health inequalities; Social support; Health-related quality of life.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License