Abstract

GONZALEZ-PANDO, David et al. Psychology and electroconvulsive therapy (II): interested consensus lacking in evidence. Pap. Psicol. [online]. 2020, vol.41, n.2, pp.132-138.  Epub Aug 02, 2021. ISSN 1886-1415.  https://dx.doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2020.2924.

This paper and its first part attempt to comprehend the use of electroshock, a technique whose effectiveness has not been unequivocally demonstrated. The lack of conclusive evidence has generated consensus, but it does not come from a genuine interdisciplinary debate. The concept of therapeutic inhibition is unfounded. Electroshock reduces the sense of personal efficacy and autonomy that characterizes a healthy functioning and introduces an implicit stigmatizing message of causality in terms of brain malfunction. There are no specific laws in Spain that regulate this procedure. The quality of the information provided to the patient is poor and could lead to professional liability. Due to its exceptional nature, electroshock should not be considered as a therapy like any other. Professionals can exercise conscientious objection for ethical and scientific reasons. An interdisciplinary perspective would be to call for potentially less harmful treatment alternatives.

Keywords : Electroconvulsive therapy; Mental Health; Patient acceptance of health Care; Evidence-based medicine; Legislation.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )