My SciELO
Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
Cited by SciELO
Access statistics
Related links
Cited by Google
Similars in SciELO
Similars in Google
Share
Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología
Print version ISSN 0365-6691
Abstract
GONZALEZ-DE-LA-ROSA, M. et al. Diagnostic capability of PULSAR, FDT y HRT-II in glaucoma suspects. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol [online]. 2007, vol.82, n.7, pp.413-422. ISSN 0365-6691.
Purpose: To determine the diagnostic capability of PULSAR-T30W, FDT-Threshold-N30 and HRT-II in glaucoma suspects. Methods: Forty-seven eyes from 47 referred glaucoma suspects (GS) were examined twice with each technique. Cases with TOP-WW-MD6dB were excluded. Results were compared with those of 70 eyes from 70 normal controls (C). Results: Mean MD value using TOP-WW in the GS group (0.96dB. sd=1.7) was not significantly different from C (0.8dB. sd=1.77) (p0.05). Disc area in GS group (2.12 mm2. sd=0.34) was significantly greater than in C (1.97 mm2. sd=0.45) (p<0.01). For 95.7% specificity, PULSAR-sLV showed the highest sensitivity of 30.9% in individual examinations. The highest reproducible sensitivity in the two examinations was obtained using HRT-II maximum contour elevation (23.4%) and reference height (23.4%), and was 14.9% for various indices after correcting for the influence of disc area (cup area, cup/disc area ratio, maximum contour depression and mean RNFL thickness). Reproducible sensitivity of the perimetric indices was: PULSARMD=8.5%, PULSAR-sLV=17%, FDT-MD=6.4%, FDT-PSD=4.3%. The association of perimetric and HRT-II indices achieved high sensitivity but low diagnostic reproducibility. Conclusions: The most effective indices were maximum contour elevation, reference height and PULSAR-sLV, although the inclusion of the optic nerve head assessment in the selection of the GS sample may have favored the HRT-II results.
Keywords : Glaucoma; perimetry; visual field; diagnosis; optic nerve.