SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.44 issue1Abdominal contour surgery in men. Technical details and case report author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Cirugía Plástica Ibero-Latinoamericana

On-line version ISSN 1989-2055Print version ISSN 0376-7892

Abstract

BENITO-DUQUE, Pablo et al. Modifications of the reversed sural flap to improve its viability in large defects foot reconstruction. Cir. plást. iberolatinoam. [online]. 2018, vol.44, n.1, pp.65-71.  Epub Feb 08, 2021. ISSN 1989-2055.  https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/s0376-78922018000100012.

Background and Objective:

The reverse flow sural flap has won great popularity, but some authors report frequent complications of total or partial flap necrosis.

We present a number of technical modifications to increase the viability of the flap when it is necessary to design it to its fullest extent to cover large defects in the foot.

Methods:

From August 2005 to August 2013, 4 patients underwent the procedure of reverse flow sural flap mega-high flap for foot reconstruction. The flaps ranged from 7 x 17 cm to 15 x 22 cm in size. The average follow-up was 60 months.

The 3 modifications that we usually perform when making this flap are: 1.- The deep fascia is incised and lifted 1.5 cm broader than the skin island. 2.- We keep the width of the adipofascial pedicle as wide as possible. 3.- We habitually suture later on after the first procedure the flap, allowing the edema to expand.

Results:

No partial or total necrosis was neither observed, nor other postoperative complications. All the flaps allowed the reconstruction of the defects, without needing other complementary flaps.

Conclusions:

We believe that the extent of the defects and their successful reconstruction with this type of megaflap, in which we have applied the changes described, justifies the presentation of our experience. However, we note that the 4 patients had no vascular risk conditions, in which it would be advisable to delay the flap or select other reconstructive techniques.

Keywords : Lower extremity; Foot reconstruction; Sural flap.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )