SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.37 issue5Potential drug interactions in patients with sepsis admitted to the intensive care unitAssessment of the utilization of angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertension author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Farmacia Hospitalaria

On-line version ISSN 2171-8695Print version ISSN 1130-6343

Abstract

GONZALEZ-BUENO, J. et al. Assessment of new drugs in a tertiary hospital using a standardized tool. Farm Hosp. [online]. 2013, vol.37, n.5, pp.388-393. ISSN 2171-8695.  https://dx.doi.org/10.7399/FH.2013.37.5.763.

Objective: To describe the profile of new drugs evaluated by the Pharmacy and Therapeutics committee in a tertiary hospital using a standardized tool, the Guideline for the Introduction of New Drugs in the Formulary (GINF form), as main objective. Materials and methods: Retrospective observational study of drugs was assessed during 2008-2011. Variables related to the drug, the request, and the result of the evaluation were collected based on information contained in the GINF form and in the assessment reports. Results: 63 of 75 assessed drugs (84%) were included in the hospital formulary. Only one drug (1%) was included without any restrictions. The rest of them were included as therapeutic equivalents (23%) or under specific recommendations (61%). Half of the drugs (6) not included had insufficient evidence of effectiveness compared with current treatments. Haematology and Medical Oncology were found to be the most active medical services in the application process. There was a high prevalence of drugs that had more than one advanced clinical trial (phase III and/or phase IV). Furthermore, 28% of assessed drugs were associated with a financial burden of more than €10,000 per year for our hospital. High-quality information was provided by applicants to the P&T committee for drugs that were finally included. However, the relationship between the information provided to the P&T committee and its decision was not statistical significance. Conclusion: The requests received were primarily related to drugs intended for parenteral use and most of them were antineoplastic drugs. The medical departments most heavily represented were Haematology and Oncology.

Keywords : Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee; technology assessment; decision-making; formularies.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License