SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.30 issue3The role of social and physiological variables on older adults' cognitive improvement after a group singing intervention: the Sing4Health randomized controlled trialCybervictimization, offline victimization, and cyberbullying: the mediating role of the problematic use of social networking sites in boys and girls author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Psychosocial Intervention

On-line version ISSN 2173-4712Print version ISSN 1132-0559

Abstract

AHMADI, Asghar et al. A systematic review of machine learning for assessment and feedback of treatment fidelity. Psychosocial Intervention [online]. 2021, vol.30, n.3, pp.139-153.  Epub Aug 09, 2021. ISSN 2173-4712.  https://dx.doi.org/10.5093/pi2021a4.

Many psychological treatments have been shown to be cost-effective and efficacious, as long as they are implemented faithfully. Assessing fidelity and providing feedback is expensive and time-consuming. Machine learning has been used to assess treatment fidelity, but the reliability and generalisability is unclear. We collated and critiqued all implementations of machine learning to assess the verbal behaviour of all helping professionals, with particular emphasis on treatment fidelity for therapists. We conducted searches using nine electronic databases for automated approaches of coding verbal behaviour in therapy and similar contexts. We completed screening, extraction, and quality assessment in duplicate. Fifty-two studies met our inclusion criteria (65.3% in psychotherapy). Automated coding methods performed better than chance, and some methods showed near human-level performance; performance tended to be better with larger data sets, a smaller number of codes, conceptually simple codes, and when predicting session-level ratings than utterance-level ones. Few studies adhered to best-practice machine learning guidelines. Machine learning demonstrated promising results, particularly where there are large, annotated datasets and a modest number of concrete features to code. These methods are novel, cost-effective, scalable ways of assessing fidelity and providing therapists with individualised, prompt, and objective feedback.

Keywords : Machine learning; Treatment fidelity; Treatment integrity; Clinical supervision; Feedback.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )