SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.27 issue2Intra-articular ozone modulates inflammation, ameliorates pain and rigidity, improves function and has anabolic effect on knee osteoarthritis: a prospective quasi-experimental before-and-after study, 115 patientsE-consults, a new tool for pain management. Results of its implementation in an organizational structure of integrated management (EOXI) author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista de la Sociedad Española del Dolor

Print version ISSN 1134-8046

Abstract

BOCETA-OSUNA, J  and  GRUPO DE TRABAJO EN BIOETICA DE LA SED (BIOSED) et al. Ethical problems in the management of pain. Qualitative study through open reflection interview. Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor [online]. 2020, vol.27, n.2, pp.89-96.  Epub May 25, 2020. ISSN 1134-8046.  https://dx.doi.org/10.20986/resed.2020.3729/2019.

Introduction:

The medical practice in the area of pain associates ethical problems in the care of patients with a disease that causes a functional deterioration, with an uncertain prognosis for their labor reintegration, and a great consumption of family and social resources. After the creation of a working group on bioethics within the Spanish Pain Society (SPS), an attempt is made to analyze these problems.

Objective:

To know which are the ethical problems that identify professionals (clinical practice, environment and institutions) which concerns SPS members; encouranging an ethical reflection.

Methodology:

Qualitative study, based on a semi-structured, open interview, send to members of the SPS (n = 1035), through electronic access, on 4 bioethical aspects: the problems detected in clinical practice, the problems of the work environment, the problems in the work organizations, and possible suggestions. These are grouped as they refer to the indications (beneficence and non-maleficence), justice (understood as equity), autonomy (information and preferences).

Results:

A total of 6 % professionals participated in the interview (n = 62/1035). A panel was prepared with the 10 main issues identified. They emphasize the uncertainty in the taking of decisions in the therapeutic, the limitation of the therapeutic effort, the conditioning of the sanitary system, the relations with the pharmaceutical industry and the search of the excellence.

Conclusions:

This qualitative study allows identifying ethical problems that interest professionals dedicated to pain. It is convenient to confirm and size them through quantitative studies.

Keywords : Professional ethics; pain management; qualitative research; basic principles of bioethics.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English | Spanish     · English ( pdf ) | Spanish ( pdf )