SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.32 issue2Predictive validity and adverse impact of the structured behavioral interview in the public sector author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones

On-line version ISSN 2174-0534Print version ISSN 1576-5962

Abstract

UNDA, Sara et al. Construction of a scale for assessing at work psychosocial risk factors in professors. Rev. psicol. trab. organ. [online]. 2016, vol.32, n.2, pp.67-74. ISSN 2174-0534.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpto.2016.04.004.

The aim of this study was to create a valid and reliable instrument to measure psychosocial risk factors at work in Mexican professors. A 66-item scale with 5 response choices was built. In order to validate the scale, it was administered to 500 public professors at Mexico city, aged between 21 an 76, 331 males and 168 females, belonging to nine higher education schools. Statistical analyses were made to know the item discriminant power, reliability, and factor structure. The scale rendered five factors: perceived inequity, difficult students, perceived insecurity, academic overload, and lack of resources at the workplace. The scales had a Cronbach's alpha between .75 and 92. As a conclusion, the scale fulfills the requirements of reliability and validity in a population of professors.

Keywords : Psychosocial risk factors; Work; Professors; Psychometric validation; Measurement.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License