SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.18 issue2Comprenhension of hazard pictograms of chemical products among cleaning workersEstimating non work-related sickness leave absences related to a previous occupational injury in catalonia (Spain) author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Archivos de Prevención de Riesgos Laborales

On-line version ISSN 1578-2549

Abstract

CORRAL, Meritxell; VARGAS-PRADA, Sergio; GIL, Josep María  and  SERRA, Consol. Return to work after musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of good practices guidelines. Arch Prev Riesgos Labor [online]. 2015, vol.18, n.2, pp.72-80. ISSN 1578-2549.  https://dx.doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2015.18.2.04.

Objective: To identify existing return-to-work (RTW) guidelines following a sickness absence (SA) due to musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) and evaluate their methodological quality. Methods: We performed a systematic search for RTW guideliness written in English, Spanish and Catalan, that included total or partial information on MSD. The identified guidelines were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively by seven experts using the validated AGREE method. Standardized scores for each domain were calculated for each of the guidelines, as well as the median of the experts scores for each of the items. In addition, each expert made a subjective judgment on the quality of the selected guidelines. Results: Thirty-two guidelines were identified. From these, 6 (3 of which were MSD-specific) were selected for an evaluation of their methodological quality. Only two, the Official Disability Guidelines (ODG) and the Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders Guide & Tools (WRGT) were felt to be suitable for use without further methodological modifications. In general, all of the guidelines properly define their objectives and target audience, and the RTW options are presented in a clear and precise way. However, all guides but one (ODG) have limitations in the criteria for selection of scientific evidence, and the potential conflicts of interest are not stated. Conclusions: Only two guides of high methodological quality were identified. However, an evidence-based evaluation of the quality of their recommendations is recommended prior to their use in professional practice.

Keywords : Systematic review guidelines; musculoskeletal disorder; return-to-work; temporary incapacity; evaluation.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License