SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 issue68Caregiving people with dementia: positive responses experienced by spousesAssessment of the level of implementation of primary health care attributes as an indicator of the quality of care provided to quilombola communities in the state of Rio Grande do Norte author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

My SciELO

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Enfermería Global

On-line version ISSN 1695-6141

Enferm. glob. vol.21 n.68 Murcia Oct. 2022  Epub Nov 28, 2022

https://dx.doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.520121 

Originals

Perception of burden of a group of caregivers of adolescents with cerebral palsy

Ana Marcela Bolaños-Roldán1 

1Universidad del Valle. School of Human Rehabilitation. Cali, Colombia. ana.marcela.bolanos@correounivalle.edu.co

ABSTRACT:

Introduction:

Cerebral palsy is an irreversible neurological condition. It is described as a group of posture and movement disorders caused by injury to the immature brain; it is not progressive and may be associated with perceptual, sensory, communication, or behavioral problems. The experience of care creates significant changes both in family life and in the social structures in which they live together.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to know the perception of burden in caregivers of severely compromised adolescents with cerebral palsy, spastic in their greater proportion, based on sociodemographic and clinical aspects.

Materials and methods:

Cross-sectional quantitative study. Two questionnaires with sociodemographic and clinical information were applied in which the Gross Motor Function Classification was used to 60 adolescents with cerebral palsy and the Zarit Burden Scale to their caregivers.

Results:

55% of the patients were male. The mean age was 16 years, 70% were quadriparetic and 75% spastic. 48% of caregivers perceived intense overload. It was also found that the socioeconomic status has a statistically significant negative relationship with the level of perceived burden (p=0.0262). 45% of caregivers perceive that due to the time they spend with their relative, they do not have enough time for themselves.

Conclusions:

Caregivers perceive high dependency on the part of the patients and insufficient economic resources for care; Additionally, they report that their family situation or interpersonal relationships are not affected by the care.

Keywords: Burden perception; cerebral palsy; teenagers; caregivers

INTRODUCTION

Cerebral palsy (CP) is an irreversible neurological condition, causing physical disability 1; mobility limitations occur as a result of decreased selective motor control, altered tone, balance, and coordination1) ;difficulties in handling, communication, and feeding, as well as behavioral problems, may also occur1. The disability generated by CP accompanies the patient and his family throughout life and its repercussions intensify as the patient ages2.

The experience of caring for people with severe CP creates significant changes in family life2; the disability generated and the difficulties to carry out an independent and participatory life in daily activities, require that there be a caregiver to supply these activities. The person who performs this work on a daily basis often has exclusive dedication, is considered the caregiver3.

In 1999, the World Health Organization defined the primary caregiver as "the person in a patient's environment who voluntarily assumes the role of responsible for the patient in a broad sense; this individual is willing to make decisions by and for the patient, and to cover the basic needs of the same, either directly or indirectly4. According to Roth et al.5 informal caregivers are those people who offer continuous, unpaid assistance in activities of daily living, to a person with a chronic illness or disability, for Wijesinghe et al. 6, caregiver burden is defined as “a multidimensional response to physical, psychological, emotional, social, and financial stressors associated with the experience of care”.

The Zarit burden scale - Zarit burden interview (ZBI) has been used to determine the burden generated by care; There is ample evidence on its use. In Colombia it is reported that it has been used with caregivers of people with chronic kidney disease7 with chronic non-communicable disease, in the elderly8, in infants with disabilities9 and in people with oncological pathology10; however, there are few reports on the burden perceived by caregivers of adolescents severely compromised with CP in the Colombian population, considering this aspect, relevant and important to study. Therefore, the objective of this study was to know the perception of burden in caregivers of severely compromised adolescents with cerebral palsy, spastic in their greater proportion, based on sociodemographic and clinical aspects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Type of study

A cross-sectional quantitative study was carried out because it sought to establish the perception of burden of caregivers of adolescents with CP based on sociodemographic and clinical data.

Population and sample

A convenience sampling was carried out. The universe was made up of 121 people who attended a neurological rehabilitation center in the city of Cali Colombia in 2017, of which 117 agreed to participate in the research. To form the sample frame, inclusion criteria were established that the patients were 12 years old or older, that they were in Level IV or V of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), and that their caregivers were informal. Finally, the sample that met the defined criteria was made up of 60 patients.

Instruments

Questionnaire for the sociodemographic characterization of patients and caregivers prepared by the researcher; aspects such as gender, socioeconomic status, educational level reached by the caregiver, postural tone and extent of the patient's injury were inquired about. To complete the patient's clinical information, the GMFCS was used; To obtain information on the caregivers' perceived burden, the ZBI scale was used.

For the field work, a physiotherapist with a postgraduate degree and experience in neurorehabilitation was in charge of collecting the information through the application of sociodemographic and clinical characterization questionnaires, as well as through direct observation of the participants, defined the level of commitment of their condition according to the GMFCS11, which classifies CP in five levels, being V the one with the greatest commitment and I the one with the best functioning.

Likewise, this professional filled out the 22-item ZBI scale with each caregiver, which was validated for Colombia by Barreto-Osorio et al12; that qualifies the level of overload based on the following qualification scores, where the absence of overload (< or equal to 46), slight overload (47 to 55), intense overload (> or equal to 56) is delimited. The scale has psychometric tests in different languages in which it is reported, an intra-observer reliability (intraclass coefficient) between 0.71 - 0.85, a validity of 0.92 and an internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) between 0.85-0.93. Thus, it has also been found that it is capable of discriminating psychological distress with a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 80%13.

Statistic analysis

The analysis of the study was carried out using complementary quantitative and qualitative strategies, given the characteristics found in the population. For the quantitative analysis, the statistical program STATA-14 was used. To determine the existing correlation between the variables, descriptive statistics, and the crossing of the independent variables with the response variable were performed. Subsequently, the respective correlations were made, taking into account the nature of the variables to make use of the appropriate tests for each case. Correlations were evaluated using Pearson and Spearman's R test and Kendall's Tau nonparametric test.

The results of the analysis with the 5-domain ZBI scale proposed by Rankin et al14. were presented through counts and percentages. For correlations between nominal qualitative variables, Pearson's chi-square test was used.

Ethical considerations

This study adopted the standards established in the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975 and the parameters of the Colombian legislation included in Resolution 8430 of 1993 of the Ministry of Health. The informed consent format was explained to the caregivers and their acceptance or not of their participation was received, which was clarified, it was voluntary. To carry out the work, we also had the assent of the patients and the express permission of the person in charge of those patients who presented intellectual disability. It had the endorsement of the Rehabilitation Center and the Ethics Committee of the Universidad del Valle (endorsement 017-016). There was endorsement for the use of the ZBI scale (User Agreement_March2016_5.0)

RESULTS

Regarding the sociodemographic characteristics of adolescents and young people with CP, and the clinical characteristics of the caregiver, Table 1 shows that 55% of the patients are male, their age ranged between 15 and 17 years, with an average 16.33 years old. Regarding its clinical characteristics, there was a higher prevalence of patients with quadriparesis 70% and 75% were spastic; 100% of the patient population was classified between levels IV and V according to the GMFCS.

Regarding the characteristics of the caregivers, 45% were in the range of 40 to 49 years, with a mean of 42.25; 45% belonged to the low socioeconomic stratum (1 and 2), 40% of them were married, 70% were the mothers and 10% were the fathers of the patients.

Table 1. Patient and caregiver characteristics. 

Table 2 shows the level of reported load, where it is observed that the majority of caregivers perceived an intense overload (48.33%).

Table 2. Caregiver burden level according to Zarit burden scale. 

Correlations

The relationship between the perceived load level and the patient's age was analyzed using the Pearson and Spearman's R test, however, no statistically significant correlations were found (Pearson's R = -0.190, p = 0.145; Spearman = -0.212, p = 0.103). No significant correlations were found between perceived burden level and caregiver age (Pearson's R = 0.080, p = 0.548; Spearman's = 0.054, p = 0.682).

According to Kendall's Tau non-parametric test (Table 3), socioeconomic status has a statistically significant negative relationship with perceived burden level (p-value= 0.0262). It is important to consider that, in high socioeconomic levels, families can access constant support personnel for their children, which facilitates the organization of the different tasks, achieving an adequate level of load, both emotional and physical.

Table 3. Burden level with respect to socioeconomic status, educational level, and classification of gross motor function. 

*p<0.05

For the nominal qualitative variables (Table 4), the Pearson chi-square test was used, finding a statistically significant correlation for the tone distribution with the sex of the caregiver, as well as for the sex of the caregiver with the relationship established with the patient and for the relationship with the patient and the marital status of the caregiver.

Table 4. Correlation among nominal qualitative variables. 

*p<0.001

Table 5 shows the results obtained from the ZBI scale from five domains as proposed by Rankin et al14. ; the frequency is determined and the percentages whose response was in the ranges of 3 (quite often - a lot) and 4 (almost always - too much) are presented.

Table 5. Domains of the Scale of Zarit. Answers with the highest percentage. 

This analysis shows that, in terms of the burden domain in the relationship, the perception of dependency on the part of their family member was present in 85% of the caregivers. In the Emotional Well-being domain, 45% of the caregivers perceive that due to the time they spend with their relative, they do not have enough time for themselves.

The domain of social and family life was the best perceived; only 26.6% report that caring for their family member causes them stress, in contrast to the finance domain in which 45% of caregivers reported that they did not have enough money to care for their family member, added to the difficulties to the personal and family support of their expenses and obligations. Finally, in the domain of loss of control over their own life, concern about what might happen to their family member in the future was present in 60% of the caregivers.

DISCUSSION

This research aimed to evidence the burden perceived by caregivers of severely compromised adolescents (Level IV or V according to the GMFCS) due to CP; This information is useful for health professionals, other social areas and government entities because in the presence of severe disability, the caregiver-patient dyad becomes a highly vulnerable population, as mentioned by Gómez-Galindo et al15., in their study on the conditions of caregivers of people with severe disabilities in Bogotá.

The best known conceptual model to measure the burden of care in CP is the one proposed by Raina et al16., however, was not used in this research because it was designed for the pediatric population and not for adolescents. The present analysis was carried out based on the integrative model of the informal caregiver by Pierre Gérain and Zech17, which has been proposed to evaluate the burden of caregivers of people with chronic diseases. The model defines as determinants of informal caregiver exhaustion, the environment where care is given, the caregiver and the environment for which it is postulated that the impact of the determinants is mediated by the caregiver's assessment of their experience and the relationship with the person being cared for. In this research, regarding the aforementioned determinants, the sociodemographic characteristics of patients and caregivers, clinical characteristics of the patients were considered and some significant aspects of the caregiver's experience and their relationship with the patient object of care are highlighted, considering the results of the correlations and analysis with the ZBI scale.

In many cultures, including the Colombian, caring for family members and especially for people with dependency levels, has been considered an exclusive responsibility of women18,19. In fact, in the present study, 96% of the caregivers were women, and 70% of them were mothers of the patients. On the other hand, the perception of intense overload occurred in 48.33% of the caregivers. Prakash et al20). in their study with mothers of children and adolescents in levels IV and V of GMFCS reported high levels of stress compared to children who walk (levels I and II); In the same way, these authors affirm that care harms the quality of life of the caregiver, who usually suffers from stress and depression, which are inversely proportional to their self-efficacy and level of social support. In this sense, these findings may be a call to comprehensive networks of health service providers to consider the importance of assigning a formal caregiver for a few hours a day for their severely disabled users.

According to the results obtained in this study, there is a statistically significant relationship between the marital status of the caregiver and the relationship with the patient. This suggests that staying as a couple represents a protective factor for the family, to the extent that care responsibilities tend to be shared and the possibility of emotional support is increased21), however, and as mentioned by Vadivelan et al3). in a study carried out in India, it is important to know the type of partner relationship that the caregiver has and to consider the presence or not of gender and intra-family violence, since this situation can become, on the contrary, an important source of stress.

Regarding physical compromise, 100% of the patient population is between levels IV and V according to the GMFCS. Some investigations report that the severity of the deterioration is not unanimously identified as an aggravating factor of load22; On the other hand, there are other studies that report that a higher level of functional disability in individuals with CP correlates significantly with a greater burden among their caregivers6,20.

In the analysis carried out, it was found that 85% of caregivers report that their family object of care depends on them and in this regard, several considerations can be made: On the one hand, size, weight, spasticity (87% of the adolescents in this study are spastic) and the contractures of the patients require greater physical effort for the caregiver23, in addition, it is important to consider that in Colombia, the assistance devices to facilitate transfers are difficult to access due to the high costs; In this sense, it is extremely important that nurses lead actions to promote health and prevent complications in caregivers19.

Another consideration is that the physiological changes that occur when caregivers get older (in this study, 45% are in the range of 40 to 49 years) suggest that physical exertion can generate musculoskeletal pain or other comorbidities, such as mentioned by Burkhard et al24., who in their study, refer that mothers usually worry if they will be able, over time, to maintain the level of care towards the family member with CP. Finally, there are reviews that support the assumption of a negative impact of the level of dependency on family adaptation25. The aforementioned aspects can serve as a wake-up call to therapists, nurses and health professionals in general so that they include within their intervention programs for adolescents with CP the teaching of effective strategies for postural hygiene and the inclusion of healthy life habits in caregivers; On the other hand, the intervention of social workers and psychologists can surely contribute to improving family and personal dynamics so that the processes of resilience and assessment of their experience of living with a family member with disabilities can be facilitated.

In the present study, 76.67% of the caregivers reported that the presence of their family member did not affect their relationships with family or friends. Natural supports are those that are not paid and are provided by the people associated with the caregiver26, which can represent an important help to generate well-being and decrease the burden for caregivers; however, some studies report that social support can be a source of stress; caregivers may feel that visits or offers of support are more intrusive than helpful27.

As mentioned by Ortiz et al28., the role of the caregiver of a person with a chronic and severe disability includes a number of demanding tasks focused on health care; The caregiver must also comply with recommendations aimed at reinforcing the care practices given by nurses and therapists in the face of the appearance of musculoskeletal complications, feeding care, socialization opportunities, in such a way that complying with all these activities requires high time reversal25. In this study, one of the greatest concerns of the caregiver population is the little time available to them (45%); Campos de Aldana et al19., mention that one of the characteristics with the greatest influence on the caregiver's burden is the daily hours of care. Sawyer et al21. found that mothers who felt more pressed for time had higher levels of psychological impairment and depressive symptoms29 chronic stress and emotional and physical exhaustion; therefore, mothers are encouraged to be supported in finding ways to counteract the real and perceived impact of caregiving.

Another consequence of an exclusive dedication of the caregiver in a good percentage of their daily time in the care of their family member with CP is that it possibly hinders their performance in a formal job and therefore economic difficulties are generated. In the present study, 45% of the caregivers live in a low socioeconomic stratum, also finding a statistically significant and inverse relationship, showing that the lower the stratum, the greater the care burden. This same percentage refers that they do not have enough money to take care of their relative, added to the rest of their expenses, which can generate a high risk of anguish in the parents25; however, some studies fail to find a relationship between family income and burden27. Another aspect related to this perception is the frequent concern reported by 60% of the caregivers in this study, regarding what may happen to their family member in the future. According to Lee et al26. many families of patients with developmental disabilities report that planning for the future makes them less vulnerable and allows them to be less anxious about changes that may occur over time or over the years. The fact that in Colombia, monetary poverty was 35.7% according to the National Administrative Department of Statistics -DANE- in 201930, suggests that financial planning is not within the possibilities of a good percentage of the population.; therefore, it is the duty of the professionals involved in the care process aimed at the population with CP, to alert and sensitize both caregivers and their families about the current legislation on protection for people with disabilities and their relatives. Finally, a limitation of the study is that it only worked with the main caregivers and the other members of the patient's primary (family) and institutional support networks were not included.

CONCLUSIONS

A high percentage of caregivers of severely compromised adolescents with CP perceive intense burden for care. The caregivers perceive a high dependency on the part of the patients, added to the insufficiency of economic resources for care and that they do not find any incidence of care on the family situation or with their friends. In this sense, health professionals, nurses, and rehabilitators (physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and speech therapists) can include caregivers in teaching effective strategies for strengthening family, social, and institutional support networks that allow coping with care more safely and with greater confidence.

REFERENCIAS

1. Bügüsan S, Kahraman A, Elbasan B, Mutlu A. Do adolescents with cerebral palsy agree with their caregivers on their participation and quality of lifé Disabil Health J. 2018;11(2):287-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.10.009Links ]

2. Freitag VL, Milbrath VM, Corso da Motta M da G. Madre-cuidadora de niño/adolescente con parálisis cerebral: El cuidado de sí misma. Enfermería Glob. 2018;17(50):325-360. https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.17.2.265821Links ]

3. Vadivelan K, Sekar P, Sruthi S, Gopichandran V. Burden of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy: an intersectional analysis of gender, poverty, stigma, and public policy. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):645. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08808-0Links ]

4. Organización Mundial de la Salud, Milbank Memorial Fund. Hacia Un Consenso Internacional Sobre Las Politicas de Atención de Salud a Largo Plazo En El Envejecimiento.; 2000. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/66542Links ]

5. Roth DL, Fredman L, Haley WE. Informal caregiving and its impact on health: a reappraisal from population-based studies. Gerontologist. 2015;55(2):309-319. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu177Links ]

6. Wijesinghe CJ, Cunningham N, Fonseka P, Hewage CG, Østbye T. Factors associated with caregiver burden among caregivers of children with cerebral palsy in Sri Lanka. Asia-Pacific J public Heal. 2015;27(1):85-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539514548756Links ]

7. Romero Massa E, Bohórquez Moreno C, Castro Muñoz K. Calidad de vida y sobrecarga percibida por cuidadores familiares de pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica, Cartagena (Colombia). Arch Med. 2018;18(1):105-113. https://doi.org/10.30554/archmed.18.1.2520.2018Links ]

8. Fajardo Ramos E, Soto Morales AM, Henao Castaño ÁM. Sobrecarga del cuidador del adulto mayor en el barrio tierra firme de Ibague (Colombia). Salud Uninorte. 2019;35(2). https://doi.org/10.14482/sun.35.2.618.97Links ]

9. Reyes Rojas M, Flórez Enciso E, Coronel Brochero L, Cadena Wilches A. Sobrecarga, calidad de vida, bienestar en cuidadoras de niños con discapacidad en dos regiones de Colombia. Duazary. 2019;16(2):134-145. https://doi.org/10.21676/2389783X.2948Links ]

10. Amador Ahumada C, Puello Alcocer EC, Valencia Jiménez NN. Características psicoafectivas y sobrecarga de los cuidadores informales de pacientes oncológicos terminales en Montería, Colombia. Rev Cuba Salud Pública. 2020;46(1). http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0864-34662020000100010&lng=es&nrm=isoLinks ]

11. Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, Russell D, Wood E, Galuppi B. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39(4):214-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07414.xLinks ]

12. Barreto-Osorio RV, Campos de Aldana MS, Carrillo-González GM, et al. Entrevista Percepción de Carga del Cuidado de Zarit: pruebas psicométricas para Colombia. Aquichan. 2015;15(3):368-380. https://doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2015.15.3.5Links ]

13. Kaneko K, Onozuka D, Shibuta H, Hagihara A. Impact of electronic medical records (EMRs) on hospital productivity in Japan. Int J Med Inform. 2018;118:36-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.07.008Links ]

14. Rankin E, Haut M, Keefover R, Franzen M. The establishment of clinical cutoffs in measuring caregiver burden in dementia. Gerontologist. 1994;34(6):828-832. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/34.6.828Links ]

15. Gómez-Galindo AM, Peñas-Felizzola OL, Parra-Esquivel EI. Caracterización y condiciones de los cuidadores de personas con discapacidad severa en Bogotá. Rev Salud Publica. 2016;18(3):367-378. https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.v18n3.53048Links ]

16. Raina P, O'Donnell M, Schwellnus H, Rosenbaum P, King G, Brehaut J, et al. Caregiving process and caregiver burden: conceptual models to guide research and practice. BMC Pediatr. 2004;4:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-4-1Links ]

17. Gérain P, Zech E. Informal Caregiver Burnout? Development of a Theoretical Framework to Understand the Impact of Caregiving. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1748. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01748Links ]

18. Rodríguez-Lombana L, Chaparro-Díaz L. Soporte social y sobrecarga en cuidadores: revisión integrativa. Rev Cuid. 2020;11(1):e885. https://doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.885Links ]

19. Campos de Aldana M, Durán Niño E, Rivera Carvajal R, Páez Esteban N, Carrillo Gozález G. Sobrecarga y apoyos en el cuidador familiar de pacientes con enfermedad crónica. Rev Cuid. 2019;10(3):e649. https://doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.v10i3.649Links ]

20. Prakash V, Patel AM, Hariohm K, Palisano RJ. Higher Levels of Caregiver Strain Perceived by Indian Mothers of Children and Young Adults with Cerebral Palsy Who have Limited Self-Mobility. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2017;37(1):64-73. https://doi.org/10.3109/01942638.2015.1138016Links ]

21. Pinquart M. Featured Article: Depressive Symptoms in Parents of Children With Chronic Health Conditions: A Meta-Analysis. J Pediatr Psychol. 2019;44(2):139-149. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsy075Links ]

22. Weber P, Bolli P, Heimgartner N, Merlo P, Zehnder T, Kätterer C. Behavioral and emotional problems in children and adults with cerebral palsy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol EJPN Off J Eur Paediatr Neurol Soc. 2016;20(2):270-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2015.12.003Links ]

23. Oliveira Barros AL, Mancia de Gutierrez G, Oliveira Barros A, Rodrigues Santos MTB. Quality of life and burden of caregivers of children and adolescents with disabilities. Spec Care Dentist. 2019;39(4):380-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/scd.12400Links ]

24. Burkhard A. A different life: caring for an adolescent or young adult with severe cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Nurs. 2013;28(4):357-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2013.01.001Links ]

25. Guyard A, Michelsen SI, Arnaud C, Fauconnier J. Family adaptation to cerebral palsy in adolescents: A European multicenter study. Res Dev Disabil. 2017;61:138-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2016.11.010Links ]

26. Lee CE, Burke MM, Arnold CK, Owen A. Comparing differences in support needs as perceived by parents of adult offspring with down syndrome, autism spectrum disorder and cerebral palsy. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2019;32(1):194-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12521Links ]

27. Chou K. Caregiver burden: a concept analysis. J Pediatr Nurs. 2000;15(6):398-407. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpdn.2000.16709Links ]

28. Ortiz YG, Clavijo Lindarte AA, Angely SJM, Angarita Vega OM. Características sociodemográficas asociadas a la sobrecarga de los cuidadores de pacientes diabéticos en Cúcuta. Rev Cuid. 2013;4(1):459-466. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/cuid/v4n1/v4n1a05.pdfLinks ]

29. Sawyer MG, Bittman M, LA Greca AM, Crettenden AD, Borojevic N, Raghavendra P, et al. Time demands of caring for children with cerebral palsy: what are the implications for maternal mental health? Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(4):338-343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03848.xLinks ]

30. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística -DANE-. Comunicado de Prensa, Pobreza Monetaria Año 2018.; 2019. http://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/condiciones_vida/pobreza/2018/cp_pobreza_monetaria_18.pdfLinks ]

Received: April 13, 2022; Accepted: July 11, 2022

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons