SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.4 issue2Family factors associated with the prevalence of caries in school children in Cartagena, Colombia author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista Clínica de Medicina de Familia

On-line version ISSN 2386-8201Print version ISSN 1699-695X

Abstract

LOPEZ DE CASTRO, Francisco et al. Quality of life of people with insomnia in the Toledo health area. Rev Clin Med Fam [online]. 2011, vol.4, n.2, pp.92-99. ISSN 2386-8201.

Objective: Clinical assessment and quality of life of the insomniac patient. Design: cross-sectional study. Setting: Primary Health Care. Toledo (Spain). Participants: Patients diagnosed with insomnia before January 2009. Measurements: Medical history review: record of diagnostic and therapeutic activities. Telephone interview: sleep history and EQ-5D questionnaire Results: N = 94. Average age 60.3 ± 14.3 years, 79.8% are women. 73.4% (95%CI 62.0-80.0%) had less than 90% sleep efficiency and 69.1% said they sleep badly. Impact: 76.8% get up feeling tired; in 70.6% insomnia interferes with their activities, in 63.2% it causes distractions and in 39.7% daytime sleepiness. 58.1% have conciliation insomnia, 25.8% have maintenance insomnia, and 8.6% early awakening. 27.8% of patients received advice on sleep hygiene. The most commonly prescribed drugs were lorazepam (47.2%), lormetazepam (23.6%) and zolpidem (19.1%). Median duration of treatment was 32 weeks (RI 58). Currently 24.7% are not taking any treatment, 21.7% of whom said they sleep well. 17.2% of those who were treated and 26.1% of those who were not considered they were in good or very good health. Older patients (r= -0.33; p = 0.001), those who said they sleep badly (55.8 vs 53.2; t = 0, 52; p > 0.05), those with early awakening (F = 3.51; p = 0.01) and those on pharmacotherapy (51.5 vs 61.5; t = 1.93 p = 0.06) had the worst scores in the EQ5D. Conclusions: Most patients with insomnia continue to sleep badly and have poor sleep efficiency, even with pharmacological treatment. The main impact is tiredness, which interferes with their normal activities. Insomnia has a negative effect on the quality of life.

Keywords : Insomnia; Quality of Life; Hypnotics.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License