SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.16 issue3Application of new technologies in primary care to monitor overweight or obese patients with cardiovascular risk factors author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista Clínica de Medicina de Familia

On-line version ISSN 2386-8201Print version ISSN 1699-695X

Abstract

CASADO-VICENTE, Verónica  and  GRUPO COLABORATIVO ACOAMFE* et al. Initial descriptive evaluation of Family and Community Medicine as a field within undergraduate medicine degrees in Spanish universities, 2023. Rev Clin Med Fam [online]. 2023, vol.16, n.3, pp.247-259.  Epub Mar 04, 2024. ISSN 2386-8201.  https://dx.doi.org/10.55783/rcmf.160303.

Aims:

to ascertain the degree of implementation of Family and Community Medicine (MFyC) on the undergraduate medicine degree course of Spanish universities.

Methods:

cross-sectional descriptive study, January-March 2023. Ad-hoc questionnaire, completed by lecturers of 44 medical schools (academic year 2022-2023). The questionnaire included six MFyC topics; that is, supervised family practice internships, shifts, teaching and evaluation methodologies and lecturers in medical schools.

Results:

a total of 41 faculties (93.2%) took part; 83% public and 17% private. MFyC course was implemented in 34 faculties (82.9%). The course was mandatory in 32 faculties (94.1%), 78% of the total.

The course was named family and community medicine only in 14 medical schools (34%) with a major variability in ECTS credits (3 credits in 13 schools [36%] and 6 credits in 11 schools [30%]). It was taught in the 5th and 6th years in 21 (51%) and 13 (32%) faculties, respectively. There was supervised work experience in 28 faculties (68%), own credits in 19 (46%). Median duration was five weeks. There was a major variability in denomination. There was coordination by family practitioners in 14 faculties (50%).

There were health centre internships in 34 faculties (83%), mandatory in 29 (85%).

There are no family medicine departments and only university teaching units in four faculties. Currently, there are only three professors and 13 tenured lecturers.

Conclusions:

development of F&CM as a field was observed in terms of courses, content and teaching staff. However, this still falls well below international standards. Weaknesses are a major heterogeneity in denomination, content, methodologies, teaching load and structure and implementation of innovative teaching and evaluation methodologies was perceived as a strength.

Keywords : Evaluation Methodology; Family and Community Medicine; Teaching Methodology; University.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )