SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue43Potentially inappropriate treatment as opposed to futility and other ethical issues in the Charlie Gard caseThe Charlie Gard case: between a shared care planning and ethical decision-making author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista de Bioética y Derecho

On-line version ISSN 1886-5887

Abstract

MARIN-CASTAN, María-Luisa. The controversial decision of the European Court of Human Rights on the Gard case and others against the United Kingdom. Rev. Bioética y Derecho [online]. 2018, n.43, pp.261-276. ISSN 1886-5887.

The commented decision of the European Court of Human Rights refers to one of the most shocking and heartbreaking cases in recent times in the United Kingdom, which has had a great deal of media coverage. It raises some of the most important issues on Bioethics, such as dignified death, therapeutic cruelty, the judicialization of bioethical conflicts, patient's autonomy by representation, passive euthanasia in childhood or the confrontation between two conceptions of bioethics: the utilitarian and the personalist. With this contribution, I will limit myself to reflecting on some of the aspects that can contribute to promote the debate, free of prejudices and fundamentalisms of all kinds, that will allow the formation of consensus, as bioethics requires in the scenario of a global world.

Keywords : European Court of Human Rights; Charlie Gard case; bioethics; dignified death; autonomy; euthanasia; child euthanasia.

        · abstract in Spanish | Catalan     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )