SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue51Teaching a culture of care: why it mattersAre there alternatives to animal experimentation? author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista de Bioética y Derecho

On-line version ISSN 1886-5887

Abstract

RODRIGO CALDUCH, Teresa. Publication bias and non-reproducibility in the ethical balance of animal research projects. Rev. Bioética y Derecho [online]. 2021, n.51, pp.61-79.  Epub Mar 29, 2021. ISSN 1886-5887.

Regulations governing animal research establish approval of research projects after having undergone a proper ethical harm-benefit assessment. Publication bias and lack of reproducibility in animal research undermine the proper ethical balance of projects. It is necessary to promote measures involving all participants (scientists, editorial groups, governmental and funder's agencies) to generate changes in the scientific culture in order to revalue negative results as part of general scientific knowledge and to increase quality of reports.

Keywords : animal research; ethical balance; publication bias; negative results; crisis of reproducibility.

        · abstract in Spanish | Catalan     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )