SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.14 issue2Self-report measures for symptom validity assessment in whiplash-associated disordersContribution of brain cortical features to the psychological risk profile of juvenile offenders author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context

On-line version ISSN 1989-4007Print version ISSN 1889-1861

Abstract

FRESAN, Ana et al. The influence of clinician gender and attitudes on judgments related to forensic considerations in ICD-11 paraphilic disorders: an Internet-based field study. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context [online]. 2022, vol.14, n.2, pp.83-91.  Epub Oct 24, 2022. ISSN 1989-4007.  https://dx.doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2022a8.

Aim:

This study aimed to identify whether clinicians' gender, clinical experience, and personal attitudes influenced their perception of criminality of specific sexual behaviours, their judgments about criminal liability if mentally disordered, and the need for treatment as part of criminal settings for those having ICD-11 paraphilic disorders.

Method:

In a secondary analysis of data only vignettes with the least (do not meet paraphilic disorder diagnostic requirements) and most extreme (met paraphilic disorder diagnostic requirements) descriptions of ICD-11 frotteuristic, coercive sexual sadism, and exhibitionistic arousal patterns and related behavior were randomly presented to participants. A total of 1,101 clinicians rated one to three vignettes (a total of 1,884) answering questions regarding diagnosis, criminal features, and their own attitudes.

Results:

The ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines were adequately used to distinguish paraphilic disorders from non-pathological arousal patterns.Vignette severity was the most important predictor for clinicians' determination that a crime was committed. Results showed an interaction of the classification of paraphilic disorders, clinicians' gender, and personal attitudes with judgments about concepts associated with criminality, criminal liability if a diagnosis was indicated, and the need for treatment in forensic settings.

Conclusions:

Increased formal education, clinical training about these disorders, and evidence-based treatment guidelines are required to avoid biases that may come from preconceived ideas and personal attitudes. Laws and policies that unnecessarily restrict the treatment of these patients in non-forensic settings—for example, when the individual is distress about the arousal pattern but no crime has been committed—should be examined.

Keywords : ICD-11; Paraphilic disorders; Gender; Forensic matters; Stigma; Diagnosis.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )