SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.2 issue3Which code does underlie multiplication?: Evidences from a magnitude decision task with masked primingSexual coercion, commitment, and partner violence among college students author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Escritos de Psicología (Internet)

On-line version ISSN 1989-3809Print version ISSN 1138-2635

Abstract

LARA CARMONA, Valle; GARCIA ORZA, Javier  and  CARRATALA CEPEDAL, Patricia. When 7+3=4 looks like correct: automatic solving of subtractions in verification task. Escritos de Psicología [online]. 2009, vol.2, n.3, pp.35-39. ISSN 1989-3809.

There is a great amount of evidence showing that adults solve single-digit multiplications and additions automatically. Nevertheless, evidence regarding subtraction and division is scarce. The present study explores whether the solving of single-digit subtractions is automatic or not. Seventeen psychology students took part in our experiment. They have to judge the correctness of single-digit additions. In the "false additions" the result could be the subtraction of the operands (e.g., 7+3=4) or could be unrelated with the operands (e.g., 7+3=2). The data analysis showed the presence of an interference effect, this is, worse performance in the subtraction condition than in the unrelated condition. These results suggest that subtraction solving is highly automatic.

Keywords : Rubtraction; automatic; verification; interference; arithmetical facts.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License