My SciELO
Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics
Related links
- Cited by Google
- Similars in SciELO
- Similars in Google
Share
Escritos de Psicología (Internet)
On-line version ISSN 1989-3809Print version ISSN 1138-2635
Abstract
LARA CARMONA, Valle; GARCIA ORZA, Javier and CARRATALA CEPEDAL, Patricia. When 7+3=4 looks like correct: automatic solving of subtractions in verification task. Escritos de Psicología [online]. 2009, vol.2, n.3, pp.35-39. ISSN 1989-3809.
There is a great amount of evidence showing that adults solve single-digit multiplications and additions automatically. Nevertheless, evidence regarding subtraction and division is scarce. The present study explores whether the solving of single-digit subtractions is automatic or not. Seventeen psychology students took part in our experiment. They have to judge the correctness of single-digit additions. In the "false additions" the result could be the subtraction of the operands (e.g., 7+3=4) or could be unrelated with the operands (e.g., 7+3=2). The data analysis showed the presence of an interference effect, this is, worse performance in the subtraction condition than in the unrelated condition. These results suggest that subtraction solving is highly automatic.
Keywords : Rubtraction; automatic; verification; interference; arithmetical facts.