SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.24 issue3Strengthening suicide prevention networks: interorganizational collaboration and tie strengthSmall worlds or worlds apart?: using network theory to understand the research-practice gap author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Psychosocial Intervention

On-line version ISSN 2173-4712Print version ISSN 1132-0559

Abstract

RANA, Shaheen  and  ALLEN, Nicole E.. Centrality measures to identify key stakeholders in Family Violence Councils. Psychosocial Intervention [online]. 2015, vol.24, n.3, pp.167-176. ISSN 2173-4712.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psi.2015.08.001.

The Family Violence Councils (FVC) are collaborative settings that bring together various organizations involved in the systems response to family violence. Social network analysis (SNA) is a technique that allows one to assess the connections between members (e.g., agencies) within a particular bounded network (Scott, 1991) and is well-suited to the study of councils. Centrality measures in SNA indicate which members in the network are central and prominent players in the setting, and therefore might be critical to engage in change efforts. The current study applied three centrality measures in five councils to identify consistent patterns regarding which organizations tend to be most central in the exchange of information among agencies responding to family violence. Further, the study examined whether and which type of centrality was related to the degree to which a given organization's policy and practices were influenced by council efforts. The study found domestic violence programs were significantly more likely to emerge as central in these settings. The study also found a relationship between an organization's centrality and perceived shifts in its policy and practices. However, only one type of centrality measure, namely closeness centrality, emerged as significantly predicting outcomes of interest when all three were examined simultaneously. The implications of these findings for research and practice will be discussed.

Keywords : Social network analysis; Centrality measures; Collaborative settings.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License