My SciELO
Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics
Related links
- Cited by Google
- Similars in SciELO
- Similars in Google
Share
Psychosocial Intervention
On-line version ISSN 2173-4712Print version ISSN 1132-0559
Abstract
TURNER, William et al. Methodological challenges in group-based randomised controlled trials for intimate partner violence perpetrators: a meta-summary. Psychosocial Intervention [online]. 2023, vol.32, n.2, pp.123-136. Epub Nov 27, 2023. ISSN 2173-4712. https://dx.doi.org/10.5093/pi2023a9.
Evidence for treatment effects of group-based Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) perpetrators programmes remains, at best, inconclusive. In the present review, systematic/meta-analytic reviews were used to identify randomised controlled trials and a meta-summary approach was employed to identify methodological challenges in the design and conduct of these trials. Of the fifteen studies identified, seven were comparative effectiveness trials. A range of methodological challenges were also identified by the trialists; source of outcome data, treatment modality, attrition and sample characteristics were the most frequently mentioned. Although there are only a few randomised controlled trials compared to non randomised studies, the findings of both highlight the need to invest in the development of innovative and/or combined IPV treatment programmes to address co-occurring issues such as substance use and trauma. The summary of methodological challenges will provide the first step in the development of methods guidance for researchers working in this area.
Keywords : Group-based perpetrator programmes; Domestic violence; Partner abuse; Batterer intervention; Gender-based violence.