SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.36 issue3Influence of environment, rural or urban, in the perception of the supports and needs of caregivers in hospitalsImpact of English-written articles included in multilingual-edited Spanish journals author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra

Print version ISSN 1137-6627

Abstract

FUERTES, C. et al. A reflection group´s experience in handling hard clinical encounters. Anales Sis San Navarra [online]. 2013, vol.36, n.3, pp.455-466. ISSN 1137-6627.  https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S1137-66272013000300010.

Background: We present the experience of a reflection group to evaluate whether the methodology carried out helps health professionals to understand difficult encounters and improve their professional satisfaction and communication with the patient. Method: We followed a cognitive restructuring methodology with a written record in order to analyze difficult encounters with patients, first individually and then followed by comments in the reflection group. Results: Difficult encounters mainly involved: requests felt to be inappropriate, questioning of professional competence, and unexpected change of doctor. The emotions arising, before and after «rethinking», changed in intensity in a significant way (p<0.001). Irrational thoughts were grouped in 9 types of cognitive distortions, with the most frequent being «emotional reasoning» and «control fallacies». The majority of constructive explanatory patterns that emerged after «rethinking» were related to the need for improving communication. The group recognized many positive contributions. Neither the surveys used to evaluate occupational burnout, nor the survey designed for the evaluation showed significant differences, comparing the beginning and end of the work. Conclusions: The joint use of a cognitive-behavioral methodology in the framework of a reflection group is mutually complementary, and enables group work without the need for professional direction. Written reflection and work with irrational thoughts and «rethinking» with the perspective of group comment is an experience that is applicable in the context of Primary Care and helps in handling difficult encounters.

Keywords : Professional-patient relationships; Focus groups; Primary health care; Emotions; Task performance and analysis.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License