Mi SciELO
Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
Indicadores
- Citado por SciELO
- Accesos
Links relacionados
- Citado por Google
- Similares en SciELO
- Similares en Google
Compartir
Gaceta Sanitaria
versión impresa ISSN 0213-9111
Resumen
NAVARRO, Albert; CASANOVAS, Georgina; ALVARADO, Sergio y MORINA, David. Analyzing recurrent events when the history of previous episodes is unknown or not taken into account: proceed with caution. Gac Sanit [online]. 2017, vol.31, n.3, pp.227-234. ISSN 0213-9111. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.09.004.
Objective:
Researchers in public health are often interested in examining the effect of several exposures on the incidence of a recurrent event. The aim of the present study is to assess how well the common-baseline hazard models perform to estimate the effect of multiple exposures on the hazard of presenting an episode of a recurrent event, in presence of event dependence and when the history of prior-episodes is unknown or is not taken into account.
Methods:
Through a comprehensive simulation study, using specific-baseline hazard models as the reference, we evaluate the performance of common-baseline hazard models by means of several criteria: bias, mean squared error, coverage, confidence intervals mean length and compliance with the assumption of proportional hazards.
Results:
Results indicate that the bias worsen as event dependence increases, leading to a considerable overestimation of the exposure effect; coverage levels and compliance with the proportional hazards assumption are low or extremely low, worsening with increasing event dependence, effects to be estimated, and sample sizes.
Conclusions:
Common-baseline hazard models cannot be recommended when we analyse recurrent events in the presence of event dependence. It is important to have access to the history of prior-episodes per subject, it can permit to obtain better estimations of the effects of the exposures.
Palabras clave : Recurrence; Cohort studies; Risk assessment; Survival analysis; Bias.