SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.109 número5Compresión esofágica extrínseca por cuerpo vertebralTorsión omental: una causa infrecuente de abdomen agudo índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas

versión impresa ISSN 1130-0108

Rev. esp. enferm. dig. vol.109 no.5 Madrid may. 2017

 

PICTURES IN DIGESTIVE PATHOLOGY

 

Esophageal perforation by a Sengstaken balloon

Perforación esofágica por balón de Sengstaken

 

 

Antonio José Fernández-López, María Encarnación Tamayo-Rodríguez, Francisco Miguel González-Valverde and Antonio Albarracín-Marín-Blázquez

Department of Surgery. Hospital General Reina Sofía. Murcia, Spain

 

 

Case report

A 55-year-old patient presented with ethanolic cirrhosis (CHILD B9) and hemodynamic instability (heart rate: 112 bpm, blood pressure: 83/62) from massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) revealed active bleeding from esophageal varices. As sclerotherapy and band ligation failed to provide hemostasis; the decision was made to use a Sengstaken balloon (SB). The balloon was insufflated with 300 ml for the gastric channel and 200 ml for the esophageal channel. X-rays after insufflation showed the gastric balloon at the distal esophagus. A repeat UGIE procedure showed a laceration at the lower third of the esophagus. A CT scan revealed pneumomediastinum (Fig. 1A). Given his clinical instability, the patient was operated on immediately, and an 8-cm longitudinal esophageal rupture was found in the lower third (Fig. 1B), which underwent primary suture repair. She died after five days from hepatorenal syndrome.

 

 

Discussion

UGIB from esophageal varices in the setting of portal hypertension is a high mortality situation. Treatment with vasoactive drugs and endoscopic ligation is effective in 76-96% of cases (1). SB is an effective salvage option when the above fails to temporarily control bleeding (effectiveness up to 90%) (2), but morbidity and mortality remain high. Major complications include: bronchoaspiration, rupture, and esophageal necrosis (2).

SB placement must be checked with auscultation to detect air insufflation within the gastric cavity, misplacement being the primary cause of esophageal rupture.

Surgery is the treatment of choice for esophageal rupture. Conservative endoscopic management with Ovesco clips and self-expandable stents has been described for smaller tears (< 10 mm) in the absence of sepsis (3).

 

References

1. Nielsen TS, Charles AV. Lethal esophageal rupture following treatment with Sengstaken-Blakemore tube in management of variceal bleeding: A 10-year autopsy study. Forensic Sci Int 2012;222:19-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.05.024.         [ Links ]

2. Lin CT, Huang TW, Lee SC, et al. Sengstaken-Blakemore tube related esophageal rupture. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2010;102(6):395-6. DOI: 10.4321/S1130-01082010000600014.         [ Links ]

3. György L, Attila P, Eszter M. Role of endoscopic clipping in the treatment of oesophageal perforations. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016;8(1):13-22. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i1.13.         [ Links ]