SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.35 número6Comportamiento hacia los alimentos y su asociación con el estado nutricional y la actividad física en una población general chilenaCaracterísticas antropométricas y de rendimiento de jugadores internacionales junior de baloncesto de la academia española de baloncesto Siglo XXI índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Nutrición Hospitalaria

versión On-line ISSN 1699-5198versión impresa ISSN 0212-1611

Resumen

SANCHEZ-SANCHEZ, Eduardo; LOPEZ-ALIAGA, Inmaculada  y  MUNOZ ALFEREZ, Mª José. Analysis of three methods of nutritional screening in oncologic patients. Nutr. Hosp. [online]. 2018, vol.35, n.6, pp.1324-1330.  Epub 03-Feb-2020. ISSN 1699-5198.  https://dx.doi.org/10.20960/nh.1878.

Background:

malnutrition is one of the complications that appears most frequently in oncological patients and causes serious consequences such as loss of lean mass.

Objective:

to know which nutritional screening method is most useful in predicting the loss of lean mass in cancer patients.

Methods:

a descriptive study was carried out evaluating three methods of nutritional screening, Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST), Malnutrition Universal Screening (MUST) and Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002), in oncological patients undergoing radiotherapy treatment. Each method was analyzed by ROC curves with AUC calculation.

Results:

loss of lean mass is present in 48.73% of the patients. Of them, 29.44% present a loss of lean mass between 0-2%; 10.66% of patients, between 2-5%; and 8.13% of patients present a loss of lean mass > 5%. The results show that when taking a loss of lean mass > 5% as a cut-off point, the MST method has a higher AUC than the one presented by the MUST and the NRS-2002 (0.596, CI: 0.444-0.747), with significant statistics (p = 0.041). In addition, it presents high sensitivity and positive and negative predictive value.

Conclusions:

MST is a more valid nutritional screening method than MUST and NRS-2002 to predict the loss of lean mass > 5% in oncological patients undergoing radiotherapy treatment. Its routine use is recommended in patients under radiotherapy treatment.

Palabras clave : Lean mass loss; Nutritional assessment; Oncology; Malnutrition.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )