SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.36 número4Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud oral en una población venezolana en el PerúTratamiento exitoso con activador funcional removible en paciente clase II esqueletal con mordida en tijera, después del peak de crecimiento puberal: caso y revisión de la literatura índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Avances en Odontoestomatología

versión On-line ISSN 2340-3152versión impresa ISSN 0213-1285

Resumen

BOFILL FONTBOTE, S; WILLIAMSON DARGHAM, F; CORNEJO URZUA, K  y  LETELIER SEPULVEDA, G. Perception of aesthetic parameters of the smile in dentists, dental students and patients of the University Mayor of Santiago, Chile. Av Odontoestomatol [online]. 2020, vol.36, n.4, pp.191-199.  Epub 05-Dic-2022. ISSN 2340-3152.  https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/s0213-12852020000400004.

Introduction:

Smile analisis in dentistry is essential when performin dental aesthetic treatments. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the perception of different aesthetic parameters of the smile among dentists, dental students and patients.

Materials and methods:

Dentists, dental students and patients evaluated 5 sets of smile pictures through qualified surveys. The photographs were grouped according to modifications made in 3 smile aesthetic parameters: gingival contour, lip line (subdivided into A and B), and dental proportion (further subdivided in width and length). Data was statistically analyzed using Chi-square test.

Results:

80% of dentists and students considered more attractive a symmetrical gingival contour, 73% of patients consider more attractive a gingival contour discrepancy up to 1 mm. Regarding Lip Line A, both Dentists (67%) and students (77%) found more attractive a smile with 2 mm of gingival exposure, 67% of patients prefered 1 mm of gingival exposure. Lip Line B, with 1 mm of gingival exposure, was considered more attractive by all respondents. The dental proportion between the width of the central and lateral incisors considered more attractive was 71%; for the width / length of the central incisors, a proportion of 75% was more attractive for the all the groups surveyed.

Discussion:

Gingival contour was the most sensitive parameter when evaluating the aesthetics of the smile. No significant diffrences in perception were found for the other two parameters included in this study.

Palabras clave : Aesthetics; perception; gingival contour; labial line; dental proportion; smile; attractiveness; parameter.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )