SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 número4Alfabetización en salud: propiedades psicométricas del cuestionario HLS-EU-Q16Abogacía por la salud de la población gitana: capacitación de profesionales del Distrito Sanitario Sevilla índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Gaceta Sanitaria

versión impresa ISSN 0213-9111

Resumen

SEGOVIA-SAIZ, Carla et al. Glass ceiling and gender inequalities in the careers of women academics in biomedical sciences. Gac Sanit [online]. 2020, vol.34, n.4, pp.403-410.  Epub 15-Feb-2021. ISSN 0213-9111.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.10.008.

Objective

To identify in the international scientific literature the obstacles and potential promoters for the advancement of women academics and researchers in biomedical sciences during their professional careers.

Method

PubMed, Scopus, CinahlPlus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycInfo and Sociological Abstracts were systematically searched for articles published in English and Spanish between January 2006 and December 2016 on the phenomenon of the glass ceiling in women academics and researchers in biomedical sciences. The screening was carried out by independent reviewers.

Results

A total of 2254 studies were found, of which 23 were included in the review. The obstacles identified for the promotion of women academics and/or researchers in biomedical sciences are: gender bias in the evaluation of research results, individualism and lack of collaboration, women's lack of influence, the existence of gender inequalities in access to employment. The perception of sexism and discrimination in the work environment, and the difficulties in reconciling work and family life. The promoting elements are: examples of women in leadership positions, mentoring, facilitating conciliation, transparency in recruitment, participation in decision-making, gender assessment of research, awareness of gender inequalities in institutions, promoting collaboration, and pay equity.

Conclusions

By enhancing the elements favouring the promotion of academic women in biomedical sciences would help to reduce the glass ceiling in the career paths of women academics and health science researchers by increasing their participation, leadership and representation. A change of organizational and institutional values is required to achieve this.

Palabras clave : Sexism; Women; University; Employment; Research; Gender bias; Review.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )