SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.30 número3El papel de las variables sociales y fisiológicas en la mejora cognitiva de los adultos mayores tras una intervención de canto en grupo: el ensayo controlado aleatorio Sing4HealthLa cibervictimización, la victimización offline y el ciberbullying: el rol mediador del uso problemático de las redes sociales virtuales en chicos y chicas índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Psychosocial Intervention

versión On-line ISSN 2173-4712versión impresa ISSN 1132-0559

Resumen

AHMADI, Asghar et al. A systematic review of machine learning for assessment and feedback of treatment fidelity. Psychosocial Intervention [online]. 2021, vol.30, n.3, pp.139-153.  Epub 09-Ago-2021. ISSN 2173-4712.  https://dx.doi.org/10.5093/pi2021a4.

Many psychological treatments have been shown to be cost-effective and efficacious, as long as they are implemented faithfully. Assessing fidelity and providing feedback is expensive and time-consuming. Machine learning has been used to assess treatment fidelity, but the reliability and generalisability is unclear. We collated and critiqued all implementations of machine learning to assess the verbal behaviour of all helping professionals, with particular emphasis on treatment fidelity for therapists. We conducted searches using nine electronic databases for automated approaches of coding verbal behaviour in therapy and similar contexts. We completed screening, extraction, and quality assessment in duplicate. Fifty-two studies met our inclusion criteria (65.3% in psychotherapy). Automated coding methods performed better than chance, and some methods showed near human-level performance; performance tended to be better with larger data sets, a smaller number of codes, conceptually simple codes, and when predicting session-level ratings than utterance-level ones. Few studies adhered to best-practice machine learning guidelines. Machine learning demonstrated promising results, particularly where there are large, annotated datasets and a modest number of concrete features to code. These methods are novel, cost-effective, scalable ways of assessing fidelity and providing therapists with individualised, prompt, and objective feedback.

Palabras clave : Machine learning; Treatment fidelity; Treatment integrity; Clinical supervision; Feedback.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )