SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.36 número1Experiencias y cambios en los padres de niños con parálisis cerebral infantil: estudio cualitativoDesarrollo y validación de una escala sobre el sentido del sufrimiento: Escala Humanizar índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra

versión impresa ISSN 1137-6627

Resumen

ESCUDERO-CARRETERO, M.J. et al. Elaboration and validation of an informative document on adenoamigdalectomy for patients. Anales Sis San Navarra [online]. 2013, vol.36, n.1, pp.21-33. ISSN 1137-6627.  https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S1137-66272013000100003.

Background. Access to up-to-date and understandable health information is a growing citizen demand, as well as an ethical duty and a legal regulation. Written information reinforces information transmitted orally during the consultation and improves recall capacity. Adenoamigdalectomy is an intervention that affects a high number of patients, the majority from the child population that has a high emotional sensitivity, and it is experienced by parents with considerable anxiety. An informative guide on adenoamigdalectomy was elaborated and validated. The aim of this article is to describe the process of elaborating the document, emphasizing its validation and results. Material and methods. The document was validated in three phases: A) Clinical content validated by professionals with a checklist and a consensus meeting; B) Analysis of grammatical legibility according to the Flesch index; C) Validation of lexical legibility with citizens by means of a validation guide and interviews. Results. The validation by professionals and citizens was highly positive. The professionals stressed the accuracy of the content and corrected some imprecisions. They made suggestions concerning format, writing style and length. The citizens stressed understandable language, resolution of doubts, respectful tone and their satisfaction with the initiative. They also differed on aspects such as their opinion of the document's length. Conclusions. The validation of informative documents by both professionals and patients is a process of great interest. Lack of agreement in their analyses makes it clear why it is important to include both sectors. The document was improved by their contributions.

Palabras clave : Information; Health communication; Health education; Informative pamphlet for patients.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons