SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.32 número1La experiencia laboral hoy: ¿precursores de cómo me siento y de lo que pienso acerca de mi trabajo?Comportamiento laboral contraproducente en funcionarios de primera línea: papel de la personalidad, la inteligencia emocional, la afectividad, el trabajo emocional y el agotamiento emocional índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones

versión On-line ISSN 2174-0534versión impresa ISSN 1576-5962

Resumen

SALGADO, Jesús F.; MOSCOSO, Silvia  y  ANDERSON, Neil. Corrections for criterion reliability in validity generalization: the consistency of Hermes, the utility of Midas. Rev. psicol. trab. organ. [online]. 2016, vol.32, n.1, pp.17-23. ISSN 2174-0534.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpto.2015.12.001.

There is criticism in the literature about the use of interrater coefficients to correct for criterion reliability in validity generalization (VG) studies and disputing whether .52 is an accurate and non-dubious estimate of interrater reliability of overall job performance (OJP) ratings. We present a second-order meta-analysis of three independent meta-analytic studies of the interrater reliability of job performance ratings and make a number of comments and reflections on LeBreton et al.'s paper. The results of our meta-analysis indicate that the interrater reliability for a single rater is .52 (k = 66, N = 18,582, SD = .105). Our main conclusions are: (a) the value of .52 is an accurate estimate of the interrater reliability of overall job performance for a single rater; (b) it is not reasonable to conclude that past VG studies that used .52 as the criterion reliability value have a less than secure statistical foundation; (c) based on interrater reliability, test-retest reliability, and coefficient alpha, supervisor ratings are a useful and appropriate measure of job performance and can be confidently used as a criterion; (d) validity correction for criterion unreliability has been unanimously recommended by "classical" psychometricians and I/O psychologists as the proper way to estimate predictor validity, and is still recommended at present; (e) the substantive contribution of VG procedures to inform HRM practices in organizations should not be lost in these technical points of debate.

Palabras clave : Interrater; Reliability; Validity generalization; Job performance; Ratings.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons