SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.19 número2La Batería UNIPSICO: propiedades psicométricas de las escalas que evalúan los factores psicosociales de demandaUtilidad de los diagramas causales para conceptualizar mecanismos en epidemiología laboral índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Archivos de Prevención de Riesgos Laborales

versión On-line ISSN 1578-2549

Resumen

GIL-MONTE, Pedro R.. The UNIPSICO questionnaire: psychometric properties of the scales measuring psychosocial resource factors. Arch Prev Riesgos Labor [online]. 2016, vol.19, n.2, pp.95-102. ISSN 1578-2549.  https://dx.doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2016.19.02.3.

Purpose: To analyze the psychometric properties of the UNIPSICO questionnaire' scales designed to evaluate psychosocial resource factors at work. Methods: The sample consisted of 2564 participants; 1391 were employees working with people with intellectual disability and 1173 were high school teachers from the Valencian Community. Data were collected through use of the UNIPSICO questionnaire, which includes scales designed to measure psychosocial resource factors in the workplace. This instrument consists of 26 items distributed in 4 scales: resources at work, work social support, feedback, and autonomy. Data were analysed to test item validity, construct validity by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), reliability by Cronbach's alpha, and predictive validity by stepwise regression analysis. Results: For all items skewness and reliability values were adequate. The four scales followed the normal distribution, with skewness values ranging between +1 and -1. The results of the CFA confirmed the hypothesised four-factor structure. The hypothesised model showed a good data fit (GFI =0,922, NNFI = 0,898, CFI = 0,912, RMSEA = 0,059). Scale score reliability coefficients for the five scales showed values above 0.80. Stepwise regression analysis demonstrated all variables were significant predictors of psychosomatic disorders. Conclusions: The validity and reliability of the four scales were satisfactory. In addition, the scales offer predictive validity for the study of work-related psychosomatic disorders. The UNIPSICO scales analyzed are anadequate tool to evaluate psychosocial resource factors at work.

Palabras clave : Work conditions; Psychosocial factors; UNIPSICO questionnaire; Psychometric properties; Factorial validity.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons