SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.18 número55Mortalidad infantil: tendencia y cambios tras la implantación del programa red madre paranaenseLos recién nacidos muy prematuros: dificultades en la escuela índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Enfermería Global

versión On-line ISSN 1695-6141

Enferm. glob. vol.18 no.55 Murcia jul. 2019  Epub 21-Oct-2019

https://dx.doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.18.3.340861 

Originals

Quality of working life and occupational nursing stress in emergency care unit

Graziela Silveira Teixeira1  , Renata Cristina da Penha Silveira2  , Vivian Aline Mininel3  , Juliano Teixeira Moraes4  , Isabely Karoline da Silva Ribeiro5 

1Nurse. Master of Science from the Federal University of São João Del-Rei, Centro-Oeste Campus. Divinópolis, Minas Gerais, Brazil. ziziteixeira@hotmail.com

2Nurse. Post-Doctor. Advisor. Associate Professor at the Federal University of São João Del- Rei, Centro - Oeste Campus. Divinópolis, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

3Nurse. Doctor. Adjunct Professor, Department of Nursing, Federal University of São Carlos. São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.

4Nurse. Post-Doctor. Adjunct Professor of the Federal University of São João Del- Rei, Campus Central - West. Divinópolis, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

5Nurse by Federal University of São João Del- Rei, Campus Central - West. Divinópolis, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

ABSTRACT

Objective

To describe the demographic and labor profile and evaluate the quality of working life of the nursing team working in an emergency care unit.

Method

Cross-sectional study, carried out in 2017 with 109 workers. A questionnaire with demographic and labor profile was used and the quality of life at work was evaluated through the adaptation of the Walton model.

Results

Of the 109 workers, 75.2% were female, 45.9% were married, 34.9% were nurses, 53.2% were nursing technicians and 11.9% were nursing assistants; 89.9% had a weekly workload of 30 hours and 39.4% had another job in nursing. The quality of life at work scale revealed that 39.5% are dissatisfied and 60.5% are satisfied.There was greater dissatisfaction with quality of life at work among nurses.

Conclusion

The findings of this study may guide health system authorities to develop strategies to promote better quality of working life for dissatisfied nursing workers and thus enable them to provide better quality care to their patients

Key words: Nursing; Occupational Health; Working Conditions; Emergencies; Public Health

INTRODUCTION

Work organizations are immersed in an environment characterized by rapid changes, whose productivity and quality of the work process are directly related to the potentialities and capacities of people and their working conditions1. The creation of new technologies, added to the set of organizational innovations, have profoundly modified the productive structure of the capitalist countries, provoking significant changes in the organization, working conditions and relations2,3.

In this sense, there is concern about quality working life(QWL), since it is closely related, among other factors, to the importance that the work has been occupying in relation to occupational health1.

QWL comprises factors and characteristics present in the work environment that aim to facilitate and satisfy the needs of the workers in developing their activities, in order to reach more satisfied and productive workers and services with better quality2. This topic has been much discussed since it occupies a central place in the human being's life, as it relates to relevant aspects of the work context, life and well-being of the worker, such as motivation, satisfaction, health and safety at work3.

According to the pioneer author of QWL studies, dissatisfaction with work is the main problem faced by workers, regardless of their job function. His model provides a comprehensive view of QWL, taking into account aspects such as physical conditions (work environment), indicators of satisfaction of basic human needs, and factors related to safety, health and remuneration, thus resulting in more productive workers4.Therefore, the QWL not only includes satisfaction with salary, but also with the physical, structural, psychological and social dimensions which, together with the occupational context, make the professionals safer and healthier, improving the results and the quality of their services3,5.

In the health area, nursing work is characterized by strongly interlinked practices and interpersonal relationships with other health professionals and service users, most of which are developed in high volume and under high pressure6. The characteristics of the profession are also associated with heavily standardized, fragmented, shift work, in addition to excessive responsibility and the constant need for theoretical and technical improvement5,6.

Among the work places of nursing professionals, the emergency services stand out, which are critical areas of great complexity, in which care should be carried out immediately, efficiently and in an integrated manner, requiring a broad theoretical knowledge and technical skills6,7.

The 24/7 Emergency Care Units (UPA 24h),described by Administrative Rule GM/MS No. 342/2013, are among the health services that provide emergency care in Brazil, and are often characterized by overcrowding, fragmented work, conflicts and asymmetries of power, exclusion of users at the gateway, disrespect for their rights, little articulation with the rest of the service network, among others8.Also, nursing workers in these units are routinely scheduled for a double or triple shift, extra hours, frequent overload justified by lack of staff, tight schedules, pressure on care practices and, most of the time, with limited resources. All this has led to the feeling of emotional exhaustion, professional dissatisfaction and increased risks of illness, as a consequence of the stress experienced in the work environment, which brings damages to the QWL2,9,10.

The complexity of the work process in the UPA 24h, which implies weaknesses in the comprehensive care to the users' needs, added to the precarious context of work of the health professionals, compromise the quality of care, as well as health conditions and the QWL. This context negatively affects the health of workers, leading to physical and mental illness and, consequently, to absenteeism and overload of the workers who remain at work9.

The suffering and stress of the nursing and health staff impact on the decrease of the quality and safety of the assistance provided to the user7,9;however, the promotion of safe work environments that favor quality of life at work can contribute to the reversal of this scenario1,10.

The importance of these units for access to services and effectiveness of care in health care networks, the role of nursing in these environments and the incipience of studies that explore this occupational context justify the development of this study, which was carried out with the objective of describing the demographic and labor profile and to evaluate the QWL of the nursing team working at UPA 24h.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This is a quantitative, cross-sectional, descriptive-correlational study carried out with nurses working at the UPA 24h of a medium-sized city, representing the polo region of the Macro-West of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The data were collected between March and May 2017, with nurses, nursing technicians and assistants who accepted to answer the questionnaires and met the inclusion criteria, namelyhavinghad an employment relationship with the unit for at least six months and not being on leave or vacation at the time of data collection. Of the 161 nursing workers that made up the professional staff of the UPA 24h at the time of data collection, 36 did not meet the inclusion criteria and 16 refused to participate, totaling 109 participants.

The workers were approached in the work environment and invited to participate in the study through the filling of self-applied instruments, namely a questionnaire containing demographic and labor variables, and the WRQoL evaluation instrument, developed and validated in Brazil by Timossi et al11.

The demographic and labor questionnaire elaborated by the researcher contained the following variables: sex, age, marital status, number of children, schooling, area of work, monthly income, position and working time in the UPA 24h, weekly workload, work shift, working time in nursing, other employment relationship in nursing, type of employment relationship, characterization of previous work leaves, use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and occurrence of errors during care.

The WRQoL evaluation instrument evaluates the factors that influence it, through eight conceptual categories: (1) adequate and fair compensation; (2) working conditions; (3) use of capacities; (4) growth and safety opportunities; (5) social integration; (6) constitutionalism; (7) space of work in life; (8) social relevance. The evaluation of the scores of the answers obtained in the instrument was performed by a five-point Likert scale, with values ranging from 0 to 100 and the response options: very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, satisfied and very satisfied11.

All the data obtained were analyzed from the construction of a database in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) program, version 21.0. The variables of this study were presented in Tables of frequency distribution, measures of central tendency and variability. Univariate analysis considered the factors associated with the results of the global WRQoL scale, categorized as dissatisfied and satisfied, and the comparison of categorical variables was performed using the Pearson chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test. In the comparison of numerical variables, we used the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test, since the variables presented asymmetric distribution. To test normality, we used the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and none of the numerical variables analyzed presented normal distribution (p <0.05).

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Research with Human Beings under opinion number 1,696,428, following the ethical precepts in research involving human beings contained in Resolution of the National Health Council No. 466/2012. All participants in the study signed the Informed Consent Form.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 109 participants, with a prevalence of females (75.2%), married (45.9%), with a median age of 37 years, composed of a majority of nursing technicians (53.2%) and with monthly income of up to R$ 1,500.00 (21.1%). Among the nurses interviewed, 81.1% had completed specialization and 73% worked in the area of specialty, according to data from Table 1.

Table 1. Descriptive analysis of the demographic variables of nursing workers at a emergency care unit (UPA 24h). Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2017 (N=109). 

*12 individuals without information (11.0%).

**4 individuals without information (3.7%).

As for the work activities, described in Table 2, the average training time was 12 years and the working time in the UPA 24h was 4 years; 89.9% had a weekly workload of 30 hours, 53.2% were public servants, 54.1% worked in the night shift and 39.4% reported having another employment relationship in nursing.

Table 2. Descriptive analysis of labor variables of nursing workers at anemergency care unit (UPA 24h). Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2017 (N=109). 

*4 individuals without information (9.3% among those who have another job).

**1 individual without information (0.9%).

The internal consistency assessment of the WRQoL instrument presented Cronbach's alpha of 0.937, reinforcing the reliability of the instrument for use in nursing.

Regarding the aspects related to the categories of evaluation of the QWL, the highest median found was for the domain space of work in life (66.7) and the lowest median was for the domain opportunities (37.5). The overall score was 54.3 and it was found that 0.9% of respondents were very dissatisfied, 38.5% were dissatisfied, 54.1% were satisfied and 6.4% were very satisfied (Table 3).

Table 3. Descriptive analysis of the QWL categories of nursing workers in a care unit (UPA 24h). Minas Gerais Brazil, 2017 (N=109). 

The univariate analysis of the factors of association with QWL was statistically significant with the professional category, leave due to work-related diseases or other diseases, provision of PPE by the company and PPE easily accessible (Table 4).

Table 4. Factors of association with the overall scale of QWL of nursing workers of anemergency care unit (UPA 24h). Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2017 (N=109). 

*Pearson's Chi-square test

**Fisher’s exact test

***Mann-Whitney Test.

The comparison of the overall analysis of QWL showed that nurses (55.3%) had greater dissatisfaction with QWL compared to nursing technicians and assistants (approximately 30% in both categories).

DISCUSSION

The study workers were predominantly women, married, with children, median age of 37 years and nursing technicians. This profile is similar to the Brazilian reality of the profession, which is predominantly female (80.7%), a reality that corroborates the findings of studies conducted in Brazil and internationally1,12,13,14.

The Federal Nursing Council (COFEN) in 2016 published an article that characterized the profile of these workers in Brazil and the results indicated 84.6% of the professionals were female15. In international studies, the female gender also predominated3,9,10.

Most health workers are made up of nursing professionals and due to the uniqueness and the history of the profession, it is made up mostly of women, who perform multiple functions besides work, such as family caregivers, mothers and housewives16.

The predominance of a 30-hour weekly workload in the study population is lower than a study done in the emergency care units in the interior of the State of São Paulo, where nursing workers presented a 36-hour weekly workload17.This reality of workload refutes the reality found in the vast majority of establishments in the country, where the claim to reduce the weekly workload of 30 hours for nursing professionals has been dragging in Congress for years.

This workload performed by professionals working in UPA 24h can have a great influence on the results found related to QWL. The prevalence of satisfaction with QWL of nursing technicians and assistants can be justified by the fact that these professionals have a weekly workload of 30 hours, which differs from the reality of other health facilities in the city where the emergency care unit is located, and workload is a factor influencing QWL1,12,18.

Most of the professionals who answered the questionnaires worked in the night shift and this prevalence can be explained by the ease of access to the institution and to the professionals in that period. The data collection during the night was facilitated by the lower demand for work found during this shift, since during the day the work routine in the UPA 24h was much harder and this factor made it difficult for the team to be absent for some minutes to respond to the instruments. Thus, professionals working at night were more accessible and available to participate in the survey.

With regard to nursing workers who had taken a leave from work-related illnesses, psychic illnesses were the most prevalent, such as occupational stress and depression.

In the emergency environment, the constant state of alertness, the excess of patients, the complexity of the organization and the work process can lead tostress and sickness of the workers19, which directly reflects the workers' QWL, and therefore, the positive association found in the study of this variable with QWL is justified.

A study carried out at anemergency unit of a university hospital in Brazil showed that the most frequent diseases reported by nursing workers were repeated infections of the respiratory tract (30.2%), mainly chronic sinusitis (27%); back injury (20.9%); varicose veins (20.6%); and mild emotional disturbance (19%)19.The increasing sickness of nursing workers contributes to an increase in absenteeism and worsening of quality of care provided10,20.

Another type of leave found was due to an work accident, being the most frequent those due to sharp objects, which is inline with the study carried out at a school hospital of Curitiba, in which 43.6% of the work accidents were due to sharp objects21.

Regarding PPE, most of the professionals reported using it, butthese data differ from those found in a study developed in a public hospital in the state of Paraná, which proved that most nursing workers do not use all the equipment recommended by the legislation during their activities22.

Lack of PPE makes work unsafe, increases the risk of accidents22 and compromises the workers' QWL. This justifies the fact that the variables "PPE provided by the company" and "PPE are easily accessible" have a positive association with QWL.

Accidents with sharp material represent a concern for workers' health due to the susceptibility of contamination resulting from contact with contaminated secretions, fluids and materials that cause diseases such as hepatitis, respiratory problems, urinary and cutaneous infections, AIDS, among others21.

In the overall evaluation of QWL, the UPA 24h nursing team is satisfied. The findings confirm that QWL can be influenced by many factors, such as salary, working conditions, safety, workload, professional growth and relationship with managers3,12,18.

A Brazilian study conducted in the state of Bahia also identified a global prevalence of satisfaction with QWL in the nursing team of 63.3%13, while in international studies assessing the QWL of nursing professionals in countries such as Canada, Belgium and Iran, moderate and satisfactory levels of QWL were found among nurses14,18,23,24.

In the categories of QWL analysis, the categories that showed the greatest dissatisfaction were compensation (salary), working conditions, opportunities and constitutionalism. Outdated wages coupled with low opportunities for professional growth in the workplace are factors for nursing professionals' dissatisfaction with the quality of working life in national and international studies1,13,12,18.

International studies confirm the important relationship between the low QWL and the higher impact factors, such as salary, workload, opportunity for professional growth and safety13,18,23,24 and these factors have greatly affected the lack of nursing professionals and the abandonment of workplaces in countries such as Iran and China3,12.

Although the factors such as compensation, opportunities, constitutionalism and working conditions identified dissatisfaction with QWL, the other categories showed satisfactory values, and the overall QWL scale of the nursing team working in the UPA 24h was also satisfactory.

When analyzing the QWL of the professional categories, nurses were dissatisfied with QWL. These data refute the findings of a survey carried out with nurses working in the general hospitals of São Luís - MA, who presented the mean QWL score of 59.72% (3.38 ± 0.47), which represents a feeling of satisfaction.1 as This is similar to a research conducted with nurses in Kashan, Iran, which also used the Walton instrument to assess QWL and found 60% of nurses with moderate QWT levels, while 37.1% had an undesirable level and 2% a good level of QWL18.

This predominance of dissatisfaction of nurses working at UPA 24h can be justified by the fact that this category has higher attributions and competencies in the service compared to nursing technicians and assistants. Furthermore, they perform the risk classification of patients at the gateway, an activity that often generates stress and dissatisfaction due to the disagreement between the risk established by the professional from the UPA 24h and the risk that the user thinks or feels to be.

Often, users disagree with the classification carried out by means of institutional protocols for risk classification. For example, the green classification represents a situation of lesser urgency and that could possibly be resolved within primary health care; however, due to lack of operation of the reference and counter-reference system, users within this classification seek to solve their problems in emergency services and become dissatisfied with the classification obtained, often acting violently against the nurse, making this work environment quite tense and exhausting25.

Another factor that may have contributed to these findings is the significant number of nurses working in an area other than their specialty, a fact that may contribute to the dissatisfaction of these professionals in the work environment.

QWL is indeed a crucial element in a multidimensional and organizational process of the work environment that reaffirms workers’ participation as a key variable to reach high levels of quality in the services and lower turnover/absenteeism. It can negatively affect the health of nursing professionals as it can trigger physical and psychic symptoms1,18.Moreover, it can also exert an influence on the patient's nursing care and, consequently, on their clinical response26.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study showed that nursing workers at UPA 24h are satisfied with QWL, since there was greater dissatisfaction among permanent professionals, who had taken leavedue to occupational disease or other diseases, while reporting that UPA 24h does not provide PPE or PPE is not easily accessible, and among nurses, when compared to nursing technicians and assistants.

Because it is a cross-sectional study, it is not possible to generalize the results found, since this design represents the current perception of these workers regarding the lived context during the period of data collection. In view of this, the reality described in this research can be altered in another moment.

This research provides an initial step to understand the profile of the professionals and the QWL of the nursing professionals working at the UPA 24h, considering the scarcity of studies using this scenario. There is little previous research with nursing professionals working in this scenario and it is worth emphasizing that this model of health unit is found throughout the national territory, being a federal program.

Therefore, the findings could guide the authorities in the health system to develop strategies to improve the working conditions of dissatisfied nursing professionals, promoting better QWL, so that they can provide better quality care and better assistance for their patients.

REFERENCIAS

1. Santos L, Rios CTF, Sardinha AHL, Santos MA, Junior CASF. Assessing quality of life in the work of general hospital nurses. Rev Enferm UERJ [Online]. 2017 [cited 2018 Feb 10];25:1-7. Available from: http://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/enfermagemuerj/article/view/1828Links ]

2. Amaral J, Ribeiro JP, Paixão DX. Quality of life at work of nursing professionals in hospitals: an integrated review. Espac Saúde [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2017 Nov 10];16(1):66-74. Available from: http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/espacoparasaude/article/view/19158Links ]

3. Lee YW, Dai YT, Park CG, McCreary LL. Predicting quality of work life on nurses' intention to leave. J Nurs Scholarsh [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2017 Nov 10];45(2):160-8. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23462044 [ Links ]

4. Walton RE. Quality of working life: what is it? Sloan management review. 1973; 15(1):11-21. [ Links ]

5. Schmidt DRC, Paladini MBC, Pais JD, Oliveira AR. Quality of working life and burnout among nursing staff in Intensive Care Units. Rev Bras Enferm [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2017 Dec 10];66(1):13-7. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672013000100002Links ]

6. Umann J, Guido LA, Silva RM. Stress, coping and presenteeism in nurses assisting critical and potentially critical patients. Rev Esc Enferm USP [Internet]. 2014[cited 2017 Dec 10];48(5):891-8. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342014000500891&lng=en&nrm=isoLinks ]

7. Dalri RMB, Silva LA, Mendes AMOC, Robazzi MLCC. Nurses' workload and its relation with physiological stress reactions. Rev Latino-Am Enferm [Internet]. 2014[cited 2017 Nov 10];22(6):959-65. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692014000600959Links ]

8. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria n. 342, de 4 de março de 2013. Redefine as diretrizes para implantação do Componente Unidade de Pronto Atendimento (UPA 24h) em conformidade com a Política Nacional de Atenção às Urgências, e dispõe sobre incentivo financeiro de investimento para novas UPA 24h (UPA Nova) e UPA 24h ampliadas (UPA Ampliada) e respectivo incentivo financeiro de custeio mensal [Internet]. Brasília; 2013 [citado 2017 Nov 14]. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2013/prt0342_04_03_2013.htmlLinks ]

9. Mullen K. Barriers to work-life balance for hospital nurses. Workplace Health Saf [Internet]. 2015[cited 2017 Dec 10];63(3):96-9. Available from:http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2165079914565355?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmedLinks ]

10. Van Bogaert P, Adriaenssens J, Dilles T, Martens D, van Rompaey B, Timmermans O. Impact of role-, job-and organizational characteristics on Nursing Unit Managers' work related stress and well-being. J Adv Nurs [Internet]. 2014[cited 2017 Dec 10];70(11):2622-33. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24842679 [ Links ]

11. Timossi LS, Pedroso B, Pilatti LA, Francisco AC. Walton's model adaptation for quality of work life evaluation. J Phys Educ [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2017 Dec 10];20(3):395-405. Available from: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/5780Links ]

12. Eslamian J, Akbarpoor AA, Hoseini SA. Quality of work life and its association with workplace violence of the nurses in emergency departments. Iranian J Nurs Midwifery Res [Internet]. 2015[cited 2017 Dec 10];20(1):56-62. Available from: http://www.ijnmrjournal.net/text.asp?2015/20/1/56/149817Links ]

13. Azevedo BDS, Nery AA, Cardoso JP. Occupational stress and dissatisfaction with quality of work life in nursing. Texto Contexto - Enferm [Internet]. 2017[cited 2017 Dec 10];26(1):1-11. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0104-07072017000100309&script=sci_abstract&tlng=ptLinks ]

14. Adriaenssens J, Gucht V, Maes S. Causes and consequences of occupational stress in emergency nurses, a longitudinal study. J Nurs Manag [Internet]. 2015[cited 2017 Dec 10];23(3):346-58. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24330154 [ Links ]

15. Machado M, Filho W, Lacerda W, Oliveira E, Lemos W, Wermelinger M, Vieira M, et al. General characteristics of nursing: the demographic partner. Enferm em Foco [Internet].2016[cited 2017 Dec 10];(7): (ESP), 9-14. Available from: http://revista.portalcofen.gov.br/index.php/enfermagem/article/view/686/296Links ]

16. Elias EA, Souza IEO, Spindola T, Simões SMF, Vieira LB. Modes of being among nursing personnel in an emergency unit. Rev Enferm UERJ [Online]. 2016[cited 2017 Dec 10]; 24(1):11726. Available from: http://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/enfermagemuerj/article/view/11726Links ]

17. Trettene ADS, Ferreira JAF, Mutro MEG, Tabaquim MDLM, Razera APR. Stress in nursing professionals working in Emergency Care Units. J Nurs UFPE [Internet]. 2016[cited 2017 Dec 10];36(91):243-61. Available from: https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/revistaenfermagem/article/download/11509/13386Links ]

18. Moradi T, Maghaminejad F, Azizi-Fini I. Quality of working life of nurses and its related factors. Nurs Midwifery Stud [Internet]. 2014[cited 2017 Dec 10];3(2): e19450. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4228533 [ Links ]

19. Magnago TSB, Beck CLC, Greco PBT, Tavares J, Prochnow A, Silva RM. An assessment of emergency nurses' work capacity. Rev Eletr Enferm [Internet]. 2013[cited 2017 Dec 10];15(2):523-32. Available from: http://www.fen.ufg.br/revista/v15/n2/pdf/v15n2a27.pdfLinks ]

20. Angelim RCM, Rocha GSA. Scientific production about the working conditions of nursing in emergency and urgent services. J Res Fundam Care [Online]. 2016 [cited 2017 Dec 10];8(1):3845-59. Available from: http://www.seer.unirio.br/index.php/cuidadofundamental/article/view/4473/pdf_1800Links ]

21. Karino ME, Felli VEA, Sarquis LMM, Santana LL, Silva SR, Teixeira RC. Workloads and strain processes of nursing workers at teaching hospital. Cienc Cuid Saude [Internet]. 2015[cited 2017 Dec 10];14(2):1011-8. Available from: http://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/CiencCuidSaude/article/view/21603Links ]

22. Stanganelli NC, Perfeito RR, Vieira CC, Trevisan JM, Ribeiro V, Gonçalves BAR. The use of individual protection equipment among the nursing staff of a public hospital. Cogitare Enferm [Internet]. 2015[cited 2017 Dec 10];20(2):345-51. Available from: http://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/40118Links ]

23. Jaafarpour M, Khani A, Mahmodian MR. Evaluation of the quality of nursing work life and its association with job burnout in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Int J Epidemiol Res [Internet]. 2015[cited 2017 Dec 10];2(1):30-39. Available from: http://ijer.skums.ac.ir/article_11994.htmlLinks ]

24. Nowrouzi B, Lightfoot N, Carter L, Lariviere M, Rukholm E, Schinke R, et al. The relationship between quality of work life and location of cross-training among obstetric nurses in urban northeastern Ontario, Canada: a population-based cross sectional study. Int J Occup Med Environ Health [Internet]. 2015[cited 2017 Dec 10];28(3):571-86. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26190732 [ Links ]

25. Oliveira JLC, Gatti AP, Barreto MS, Bellucci JJA, Góes HLF, Matsuda LM. User embracement with risk classification: perceptions of the service users of an emergency care unit. Texto Contexto - Enferm [Internet]. 2017[cited 2018 Feb 10];26(1):1-8. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-07072017000100301&lng=enLinks ]

26. Borhani F, Arbabisarjou A, Kianian T, Saber S. Assessment of predicTable productivity of nurses working in Kerman University of Medical Sciences' Teaching Hospitals via the dimensions of quality of work life. Glob J health Sci [Internet]. 2016[cited 2017 Dec 10]; 8(10):55666. Available from: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/55666Links ]

Received: September 09, 2018; Accepted: November 05, 2018

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons