SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.35 número3Telepráctica en Atención Temprana: una escala de validez social informada por padresAdaptación española de la Escala de Demandas Laborales Intensificadas (IDS) índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Psicothema

versión On-line ISSN 1886-144Xversión impresa ISSN 0214-9915

Resumen

HORCAJO, Javier; GIL, Rafael  y  SORREL, Miguel A. Spanish adaptation of the Need for Affect Questionnaire (NAQ and NAQ-S). Psicothema [online]. 2023, vol.35, n.3, pp.279-289.  Epub 13-Nov-2023. ISSN 1886-144X.  https://dx.doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2022.328.

Background:

Need for affect (NA) refers to individual differences in the motivation to approach or avoid emotion-inducing situations and activities. Prior research has demonstrated that NA is a relevant construct for understanding psychological processes related to affect. The present study aimed to adapt and validate the English version of the Need for Affect Questionnaire (NAQ), as well as the short version (i.e., the NAQ-S), to Spanish. We examined evidence of validity and reliability in the NAQ and NAQ-S scores.

Method:

Study 1 (N = 416) analyzed the psychometric properties of scores from the Spanish adaptation of the NAQ, as well as the relationships with measures of other relevant psychological constructs. Study 2 (N = 118) tested the validity and reliability of scores from the Spanish adaptation of the NAQ-S.

Results:

We found two main factors (i.e., Emotion Approach and Emotion Avoidance), and the internal consistency of both the NAQ and the NAQ-S scores, as well as their test-retest reliability, were adequate. Relationships with other measures were in line with prior research, providing positive evidence of concurrent validity.

Conclusions:

Scores from both instruments showed validity and reliability, so should be considered in future research related to NA.

Palabras clave : Need for affect; Factor analysis; Validity; Reliability.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )