SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número46Perspectiva ética de la rehabilitación basada en la comunidad en el contexto chileno índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista de Bioética y Derecho

versión On-line ISSN 1886-5887

Resumen

CRESPO SANTIAGO, Víctor. Nonhuman animals as legal rights holders: the High Court of Uttarakhand judgement in the case Narayan Dutt Bhatt vs. State of Uttarakhand and others. Rev. Bioética y Derecho [online]. 2019, n.46, pp.203-217.  Epub 01-Oct-2019. ISSN 1886-5887.

This article analyses the argumentation and the scope of the High Court of Uttarakhand's rulling that declares all members of the animal kingdom to be rights holders and also establishes positive legal obligations towards stray animals. Due to the fact that the capacity for suffering and enjoying is the only relevant fact to morally consider an entity, we have good reasons to think that we must bestow legal rights to nonhuman animals in order to protect their fundamental interests. Those rights shouldn't be just negative rights, but some of those should entail that certain human beings have, at least in some circunstances, positive obligations towards the other animals.

Palabras clave : nonhuman animals; legal rights holder; legal personhood; High Court of Uttarakhand; speciesism.

        · resumen en Español | Catalán     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )