SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.23 número1Percepción estudiantil del uso del video como herramienta de retroalimentación a distancia: estudio pilotoCuestionario de atributos del docente: evidencias de validez y fiabilidad en carreras de la salud índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


FEM: Revista de la Fundación Educación Médica

versión On-line ISSN 2014-9840versión impresa ISSN 2014-9832

Resumen

SERVIN, David. Interprofessional formative design: a strategy to develop complex thought in health science students. FEM (Ed. impresa) [online]. 2020, vol.23, n.1, pp.39-44.  Epub 09-Mar-2020. ISSN 2014-9840.  https://dx.doi.org/10.33588/fem.231.1038.

Introduction:

Clinical practice requires systemic knowledge and an interprofessional act, hence, health professionals must be trained in the exercise of complex thinking.

Aim:

An interprofessional formative design is presented, whose purpose is to contribute to the development of complex thinking in the clinical performance of health science students.

Subjects and methods:

Medical, nursing and psychology students were included, who completed two theoretical sessions to study the neurobiology and pharmacology of antidepressant medications through a written case, and the psychotherapy; an interdisciplinary seminar, in which, they defined their professional roles, an integral treatment and an interprofessional collaboration; and a simulation station with a standardized patient to evaluate, by checklist, in four categories of application of complex thinking: diagnostic assessment, therapeutic indication, communication with the patient, and interprofessional, with 47 tasks in total.

Results:

It was found that the mean average in the categories of complex thinking were between 8.1 ± 1.8 and 9.3 ± 0.9, also, that the percentages of students who completed the different tasks were from 80% to 94%. There were no statistical differences between the groups.

Conclusions:

The implementation of an interprofessional formative design becomes a learning and evaluation strategy that contributes to the development of complex thinking in the clinical performance of health science students.

Palabras clave : Clinical performance; Complex thinking; Depression; Interprofessionalism; Standardized patient.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )