SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.43 número4Análisis de los criterios sobre precio y financiación de los medicamentos huérfanos en EspañaAdherencia a las terapias biológicas en pacientes con artropatías inflamatorias crónicas índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Farmacia Hospitalaria

versión On-line ISSN 2171-8695versión impresa ISSN 1130-6343

Resumen

PEREZ-RICART, Ariadna et al. Integrating pharmacovigilance into the routine of pharmacy department: experience of nine years. Farm Hosp. [online]. 2019, vol.43, n.4, pp.128-133.  Epub 14-Oct-2019. ISSN 2171-8695.  https://dx.doi.org/10.7399/fh.11169.

Objective

To describe our pharmacovigilance program and to analyze the reported adverse drug reactions.

Method

Observational longitudinal study conducted from 2008 to 2016. The Pharmacy Department leads the pharmacovigilance program and performs prospective, retrospective, intensive, and spontaneous reporting of inpatients and outpatients (emergencies, day hospital, external consultations, and nursing homes). Each adverse drug reaction is incorporated in the electronic health record of the patient along with an alert.

Results

A total of 2,631 adverse drug reactions were reported in 2,436 patients. Of these patients, 52% were men with a mean age of 63.3 (0-98) years. A total of 92.8% drug events were reported by the pharmacists and 7.2% by doctors, nurses, and technicians. A total of 63.7% were reported in inpatients, 19.2% in emergencies, 10.6% in external consultations, 6.2% in the day hospital, and 0.3% in diagnostic radiology. There was an increase in adverse drug reactions detected by prospective and intensive pharmacovigilance. Principal therapeutic groups involved in adverse drug events were antineoplastic agents (21.3%), antibacterials (12.3%), antithrombotics (7.7%), analgesics (6.7%), corticosteroids (5.2%), psycholeptics (5.2%), diuretics (4.9%), antivirals (4.9%), antiinflammatories and antirheumatics (4.2%), and immunosupressants (3.3%). Adverse drug reactions mainly affected the skin and appendages (19.7%) and gastrointestinal tract (19.1%). Adverse drug reactions were mild (38.7%), severe (30.8%), and moderate (30.5%). In total, 60.9% of patients recovered from drug events and 31.7% were in recovery. The most frequent response was treatment interruption in 65% of cases and the patients received additional specific treatment in 56% of cases.

Conclusions

The incorporation of the pharmacovigilance program within the daily routine of the hospital pharmacist provides added value to the safety and pharmacotherapy of the patient.

Palabras clave : Pharmacovigilance; Adverse drug reactions; Drug monitoring; Hospital pharmacy services; Adverse drug event; Drug reaction reporting systems.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español | Inglés     · Español ( pdf ) | Inglés ( pdf )