SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.11 número9Salud autopercibida, apoyo social y familiar de los pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónicaCribado del cáncer de cérvix: ¿la misma frecuencia para mujeres inmigrantes latinoamericanas? índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartir


Medifam

versión impresa ISSN 1131-5768

Resumen

GONZALEZ ALONSO, N. et al. Do we control our hypertensive patients better than five years ago?. Medifam [online]. 2001, vol.11, n.9, pp.54-59. ISSN 1131-5768.

Setting: urban Health Centre.  Subjects: diagnosed patients of hypertension in three Primary Health Care surgeries.  Objectives: to know the degree of control of hypertensive patients in 1995 and the actual moment, and the treatment used.  Design: cross-sectional descriptive in 1995 and 2000.  Interventions: through clinic hystory were taken social demographics dates, personal antecedents and associated disease, and blood pressure and treatment, in 1995 and the actual moment. All dates were incorporated to a data base "r-sigma", using tools of descriptive and analytical statistics.  Results: there were 456 hypertensive patients (approximately 80% were under 65 years and 2/3 women). The mean blood pressure in 1995 and 2000 were of systolic blood pressure (SBP) (144.62 vs 141.69, p<0.05, t=2.29) and dyastolic blood pressure (DBP) (82.06 vs 80.48, p<0.001, t=3.475). In reference to the blood pressure control, in 1995 and 2000, following the OMS criteria, was: "optimum"(2.1% in 1995 vs 3.5% in 2000), "normal"(6.2 vs 11.5%), "normal-high"(27.3 vs 27.9%), "HT-1"(47.1 vs 49.5%), "HT-2"(15.3 vs 6.9%) and "HT-3"(2.1 vs 0.7%); dates with statistically significants differences (χ52 =3.828 p<0.001).  In 1995 the porcentage of patiens with normal rates of blood pressure were 35.54% and in the actual moment 43.02% (χ2= 4.158, p<0.05). The treatment followed in 1995 and 2000 was dietetic (19.6 vs 13.3%), monotherapy (50.4 vs 51.66%) and association (29.91 vs 35.03%), χ22 = 6.482, p<0.05. Pharmacological groups more used in both cases were ACEI, tiacides and calcium blockers. It were founded in 2000, an increase in using ARA-II and beta-blockers.  Conclusions: the blood pressure control have improved respects to 1995, perhaps in relation with more aggressive treatment (increase of using drugs and associations). We have found a change in pharmacological perfil used.

Palabras clave : Hypertension; Treatment; Outcome assessment; Primary Health Care.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons