Mi SciELO
Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
Indicadores
- Citado por SciELO
- Accesos
Links relacionados
- Citado por Google
- Similares en SciELO
- Similares en Google
Compartir
FEM: Revista de la Fundación Educación Médica
versión On-line ISSN 2014-9840versión impresa ISSN 2014-9832
Resumen
ARRIBALZAGA, Eduardo B.. Rubric for evaluation of simulated clinical record. FEM (Ed. impresa) [online]. 2016, vol.19, n.2, pp.93-99. ISSN 2014-9840.
Introduction. Evaluation of skills can be shown to create a simulated without patients medical record. Aims to describe the rubric and to compare with conventional test. Subjects and methods. Descriptive cross-sectional observational study; students of the fifth year of medicine, State College during subject surgery at a university hospital in official course evaluated in 2015 with the elaboration of a simulated medical record without patients on issues of non-cardiovascular thoracic surgery with advance directives. Duration of 60 minutes. Comparative analysis of all the case records simulated by the conventional evaluation and method of rubric. Statistical tests were used. Results. Of 37 cases, with conventional evaluation average slightly above the rubric - but its influence is greater in the context of the totality of the conventional partial examination ratified by its value within the partial exam. Rubric note versus final note also significant partial examination ratings. Rubric versus conventional partial exam final note had an acceptable correlation. Evaluation with rubric has one number of approved less than with the conventional; reliability as an instrument of acceptable value (0.73). Conclusion. The rubric as a tool for evaluation of a simulated clinical record without patients has a high degree of validity and reliability.
Palabras clave : Evaluation; Medical record; Rubric.