Mi SciELO
Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
Indicadores
- Citado por SciELO
- Accesos
Links relacionados
- Citado por Google
- Similares en SciELO
- Similares en Google
Compartir
FEM: Revista de la Fundación Educación Médica
versión On-line ISSN 2014-9840versión impresa ISSN 2014-9832
Resumen
LOPEZ-ALEGRIA, Fanny y FRAILE, Claudia. Active teaching methodologies versus traditional paradigm: a systematic review. FEM (Ed. impresa) [online]. 2023, vol.26, n.1, pp.5-12. Epub 17-Abr-2023. ISSN 2014-9840. https://dx.doi.org/10.33588/fem.261.1255.
Introduction.
The current educational scenario has required incorporating active-participatory methodologies for the construction of knowledge together with students into the traditional teaching-learning paradigm.
Objective.
To verify the differences between the application of active participatory methodologies with the traditional paradigm in the learning of students in the health area.
Material and methods.
A systematic review was carried out in the bibliographic bases Medline, LILACS, ERIC and SciELO, using the search strategy: ‘students, health occupations' AND ‘patient simulation' OR ‘standardized patient' OR ‘hybrid simulation' OR ‘high fidelity simulation training' OR ‘simulation Training' OR ‘problem based learning' OR ‘inverted classroom' OR ‘flipped classroom' AND ‘traditional classroom' AND learning OR ‘Kolb´s learning' OR ‘Kirkpatrick model' OR ‘soft skills test'.
Results.
Of the 1,085 records identified, 11 articles were included for analysis. In these articles, when comparing the traditional classroom with the active participatory methodologies, the latter obtained better results in the learning variables, confidence in the acquisition of learning, critical thinking and skills, but there was no statistical significance in most of the studies.
Conclusions.
No statistically significant differences were found in student learning between the use of active learning methodologies and the traditional paradigm.
Palabras clave : Learning; Lecture; Methodology; Problem-based learning; Simulation training; Students.