Mi SciELO
Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
Indicadores
Citado por SciELO
Accesos
Links relacionados
Citado por Google
Similares en SciELO
Similares en Google
Compartir
Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra
versión impresa ISSN 1137-6627
Resumen
GOST, J. et al. Evaluation of the clinical practice of Informed Consent in clinical trials. Anales Sis San Navarra [online]. 2003, vol.26, n.1, pp.35-42. ISSN 1137-6627.
On the basis of existing publications it would seem legitimate to assume that in a clinical test (CT) the difficulties inherent in the process of researcher-participant communication are in practice greater than desired. Similarly, the hypothesis is adopted that difficulties exist in the formal legibility of the documents of Informed Consent. We present the results of a transversal study made of a random sample (n=160) of the CTs approved by the Ethical Committee of Clinical Research (CEIC) of Navarra during the years 1995-1999. The results found were: in 69.7% of the cases the researcher filed the documents corresponding to the CT, the Informed Consent appears signed by the researcher in 56.6% of the CTs, and in more than 83% of the cases the written information shows shortcomings in legibility, which confirms the correctness of the hypothesis and permits the detection of areas where improvements need to be developed.
Palabras clave : Clinical trials with medicines; Informed consent; Legibility; Helsinki Declaration; Ethical Committee of Clinical Research.