SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.42 número3Análisis comparativo de instrumentos destinados a la evaluación del acoso escolar índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Papeles del Psicólogo

versão On-line ISSN 1886-1415versão impressa ISSN 0214-7823

Resumo

MARKASHOVA, EI et al. Meeting in the middle: Luria's approach and cognitive approach to spoken language impairment in aphasia. Pap. Psicol. [online]. 2021, vol.42, n.3, pp.230-234.  Epub 06-Jun-2022. ISSN 1886-1415.  https://dx.doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol.2958.

The aim of this paper is to compare and analyze two approaches to aphasia: The systemic dynamic localization of higher mental functions theory developed by A.R. Luria and neurocognitive dual-route model. To our knowledge, comparative analysis of these two theories was never done before. We found similarities between these two theories, as well as differences between them. One of the key differences is that while Luria's approach views various symptoms as systemic consequences of a primary impairment, the dual-route model sees these symptoms as independent and unrelated. This major difference between two approaches can be explained: Luria's approach is in line with classic “syndrome analysis” of aphasia, contrary to the cognitive approach, which assumes that classic syndromes are unable to explain all diversity of clinical symptoms.

Palavras-chave : Aphasia; Luria; Dual-route model; Speech; Neuropsychology.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )