SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.8 número4Política, educación y práctica del cumplimiento terapéutico: perspectiva internacionalConocimiento y uso de ácido fólico entre estudiantes universitarias: un programa piloto de promoción de la salud conducido por estudiantes de farmacia índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Pharmacy Practice (Granada)

versão On-line ISSN 1886-3655versão impressa ISSN 1885-642X

Resumo

PEREZ VELASCO, Román. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in a large British hospital: comparison with published experience. Pharmacy Pract (Granada) [online]. 2010, vol.8, n.4, pp.213-219. ISSN 1886-3655.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) are high-cost agents recommended as prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia or as adjunctive treatment of severe neutropenic sepsis. Their use in high-risk situations such as acute myeloid leukaemia, acute lymphocytic leukaemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and stem cell transplantation is also indicated. Objective: This audit assessed the use of G-CSF within the Oncology and Haematology Service Delivery Unit at Guy´s and St. Thomas´ hospital (London, United Kingdom). Methods: Patients who received G-CSF in April-May 2008 were identified retrospectively from the pharmacy labelling system, and chemotherapy front sheets, clinic letters and transplantation protocols were reviewed. Patients on lenograstim, in clinical trials or under non-approved chemotherapy protocols were excluded. Results: A total of 104 G-CSF treatments were assessed. The most commonly treated malignancy was breast cancer (41.3%), with docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (34.6%) being the most frequent chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy intent was curative in 66.3 % of cases. Pegfilgrastim was used in 73.1 % of cases and primary prophylaxis was the most common indication (54.8%). Stem cell transplantation was the first indication to meet the audit criterion (93.3%), followed by primary prophylaxis (89.5%). There was a considerable non-adherence for secondary prophylaxis (6.7%). Conclusion: The overall level of compliance with the audit criteria was 72.1%. The results for primary and secondary prophylaxis would have been different if FEC100 (fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide) and docetaxel 100 mg/m2 had been considered a single chemotherapy regimen. Also, the lack of access to medical notes may have affected the reliability of the results for "therapeutic" use.

Palavras-chave : Hematopoietic Cell Growth Factors; Neutropenia; Clinical Audit; Drug Utilization Review; United Kingdom.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons