SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.26 número4Percepción de los estudiantes de las carreras de la salud sobre la utilización de metodologías activas para la enseñanza y aprendizaje de la histologíaFactores que influyen en la elección de la plaza de formación sanitaria especializada de MIR índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


FEM: Revista de la Fundación Educación Médica

versão On-line ISSN 2014-9840versão impressa ISSN 2014-9832

Resumo

DI-BERNARDO, Juan J  e  NAVARRO, Viviana de los Ángeles. Assessment as learning of cognitive and metacognitive skills. Effects of a multi-method evaluation system. FEM (Ed. impresa) [online]. 2023, vol.26, n.4, pp.167-173.  Epub 12-Fev-2024. ISSN 2014-9840.  https://dx.doi.org/10.33588/fem.264.1294.

Objective

Analyze and categorize the cognitive processing activities (APC) that students develop in a multi-method longitudinal assessment system (ELM).

Material and methods

A qualitative-quantitative study where the cognitive scope of all the evaluation instruments was assessed, based on the APC applied by the students in the questions and requests formulated, categorized according to Bloom's taxonomy: remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate and create. For each instrument, the proportion of items corresponding to each taxonomic level was calculated.

Results

In the ELM, the students carried out these APC: remember (physiopathological mechanism, probable etiology, prevalent entity, therapeutic objectives, treatment time, diagnostic method); identify (risk factors, problems, abnormal data, adverse effects, drugs of choice); interpret (signs/symptoms, laboratory, image, study); recognize (patterns, syndromes, severity, urgency); compare (studies, treatments, differential diagnoses); analyze (prioritize problems, propose hypotheses, prioritize interventions, infer results, reflect on their performance and learning); decide (treatment, emergency measure, proper conduct, suspend treatment); justify (studies, treatments, behaviors, guiding questions); planning (diagnostic sequences, studies to evaluate evolution, immunization plan); synthesize (integrate manifestations, clinical summary, bibliographic record); evaluate (reasonings, relevant commitment, probable prognosis, hospitalization area, external validity of the article, justify comments). These APC cover all taxonomic levels, with similar representations in the word cloud of the lower-order and higher-order cognitive levels.

Conclusions

The combination of different evaluation instruments allows expanding the cognitive scope of the evaluation process, constituting a very appropriate space for students to apply and develop cognitive and metacognitive skills.

Palavras-chave : Bloom; Cognitive scope; Competencies; Educational impact; Medical education; Reasoning.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )