SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 número4Evaluación de la expresión de la subunidad p22 phox de la NADPH oxidasa (NOX) en cáncer de próstata e hiperplasia prostática benigna: estudio comparativoEfectividad y satisfacción con el tratamiento en pacientes con disfunción eréctil en España: Estudio EDOS índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Actas Urológicas Españolas

versão impressa ISSN 0210-4806

Resumo

RUIZ-ARAGON, J.  e  MARQUEZ-PELAEZ, S.. Assessment of the PCA3 test for prostate cancer diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Actas Urol Esp [online]. 2010, vol.34, n.4, pp.346-355. ISSN 0210-4806.

Objective: To assess the efficacy of diagnostic techniques based on PCA3 gene for early detection of prostate cancer. We carried out a systematic review of scientific literature and subsequent meta-analysis. Material and methods: A literature search (2000-09) in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CRD, ECRI, Hayes databases and journals of Cancer and Urology. MESH terms used were "Prostatic Neoplasms", Prostate-Specific Antigen", "Antigens, Neoplasm", "Sensitivity and Specificity", "Predictive Value of Tests", and free terms "upm3", "PCA3", "dd3", "aptima PCA3" and "prostate cancer antigen 3". Patients were adults. The intervention was to determine the PCA3 gene, from urine samples for diagnosis of prostate cancer. The quality of the studies was checked according to QUADAS criteria. We calculated diagnostic accuracy rates and developed a meta-analysis to synthesize results. Results: 14 studies of diagnostic tests were selected, with moderate-high quality. The sensitivity was between 46.9% and 82.3%, specificity ranged from 56.3% to 89%, positive predictive value had a range of 59.4-97.4% and negative predictive value 87.8-98%. The meta-analysis detected the existence of a threshold effect and heterogeneity between studies. Global sensitivity values was 0.85 [CI 0.84-0.87], specificity 0.96 [CI 0.96-0.97], positive likelihood ratio 22.21 [CI 15.12-32.63], and negative of 0.15 [CI 0.13-0.18]. Conclusions: Detection techniques have acceptable diagnostic accuracy rates for using in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Palavras-chave : Prostate cancer; Diagnosis; PCA3; Early detection.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons