SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.19 número2Influencia de la formulación de la glutamina en sus efectos sobre los sistemas antioxidantes y de destoxificación hepática en la rataEvaluación nutricional pre y postoperatoriade los pacientes con megaesófago por enfermedad de Chagas índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartilhar


Nutrición Hospitalaria

versão On-line ISSN 1699-5198versão impressa ISSN 0212-1611

Resumo

MOURAO, F. et al. Nutritional risk and status assessment in surgical patients: a challenge amidst plenty. Nutr. Hosp. [online]. 2004, vol.19, n.2, pp.83-88. ISSN 1699-5198.

Background and Aims: No gold standard exists for nutritional screening/assessment. This cross-sectional study aimed to collect/use a comprehensive set of clinical, anthropometric, functional data, explore interrelations, and derive a feasible/sensitive/specific method to assess nutritional risk and status in hospital practice. Patients and Methods: 100 surgical patients were evaluated, 49M:51F, 55 ± 18.9(18-88) years. Nutritional risk assessment: Kondrup’s Nutritional Risk Assessment, BAPEN's Malnutrition Screening Tool, Nutrition Screening Initiative, Admission Nutritional Screening Tool. Nutritional status: anthropometry categorised by Body Mass Index and McWhirter & Pennington criteria, recent weight loss 10%, dynamometry, Subjective Global Assessment. Results: There was a strong agreement between all nutritional risk (k = 0.69-0.89, p <0.05) and between all nutritional assessment methods (k = 0.51- 0.88, p ≤ 0.05) except for dynamometry. Weight loss 10% was the only method that agreed with all tools (k = 0.86-0.94, p ≤ 0.05), and was thereafter used as the standard. Kondrup’s Nutritional Risk Assessment and Admission Nutritional Screening Tool were unspecific but highly sensitive (≥ 95%). Subjective Global Assessment was highly sensitive (100%) and specific (69%), and was the only method with a significant Youden value (0.7). Conclusions: Kondrup’s Nutritional Risk Assessment and Admission Nutritional Screening Tool emerged as sensitive screening methods; the former is simpler to use, Kondrup’s Nutritional Risk Assessment has been devised to direct nutritional intervention. Recent unintentional weight loss 10% is a simple method whereas Subjective Global Assessment identified high-risk/undernourished patients.

Palavras-chave : Malnutrition; Nutritional risk; Nutritional status; Screening; Surgical patients; Hospital.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons