SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.30 número1Radiofrecuencia pulsada del nervio supraescapular en el tratamiento del hombro dolorosoNo es solo dolor lumbar: manifestación atípica del aneurisma de aorta índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista de la Sociedad Española del Dolor

versão impressa ISSN 1134-8046

Resumo

HAMED, Rasha et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in pain and opioid consumption after spine surgery. Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor [online]. 2023, vol.30, n.1, pp.49-59.  Epub 05-Fev-2024. ISSN 1134-8046.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1985.

Background:

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has shown promising results in alleviating different types of pain. The present study compares the efficacy of three sessions of anodal tDCS applied over primary motor area (M1) or the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or sham on reducing pain and the total opioid consumption in postoperative spine surgery patients.

Materials:

Sixty-seven out of 75 eligible patients for postoperative spine surgery were randomly allocated into one of the three experimental groups. Group A received anodal tDCS applied over M1 cortex, group B over left DLPF cortex (2 mA, 20 min) and group C received sham tDCS, all for 3 consecutive postoperative days. Patients were evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and adynamic visual analogue scale (DVAS) at baseline, and on each of the treatment days. The total morphine consumption over the 3 postoperative days was assessed.

Results:

Two-way repeated measures ANOVA showed no statistically significant difference in resting VAS between the three groups. However, there was significant pain improvement (P < 0.001) in DVAS in both active groups (group A and B) compared to the sham group (group C) in the postoperative period, with no significant difference between the active groups. Morphine consumption was significantly reduced in both active groups compared with the sham group, but there was no difference in consumption between the active groups.

Conclusion:

There was a significant postoperative reduction in morphine consumption and DVAS scores after three sessions of active tDCS.

Significance:

tDCS is a promising tool for alleviating pain in the field of postoperative spine surgery.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )