SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.44 número2La percepción local del acceso a los servicios de salud en las áreas rurales. El caso del pirineo navarroRol de sCD40L en la predicción de súper-respuesta a la terapia de resincronización cardiaca índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra

versão impressa ISSN 1137-6627

Resumo

RUIZ-MIRALLES, ML et al. Design and validation of the Complex Case Evaluation Index, an instrument to identify complex patients. Anales Sis San Navarra [online]. 2021, vol.44, n.2, pp.195-204.  Epub 07-Fev-2022. ISSN 1137-6627.  https://dx.doi.org/10.23938/assn.0946.

Background

The aim was to develop and validate the Complex Case Assessment Index (CCAI), a specific instrument to identify complex patients.

Methods.

Instrumental study in two phases: 1) Development of the scale: the variables extracted from the literature were firstly defined and operationalized, and then submitted for expert judgment. The CCAI included 14 variables divided into two dimensions: complexity of clinical management and complexity of community management. 2) Psychometric study: evaluation of the reliability and validity of the scale by equivalence between observers (Pearson's r), criterion validity with respect to the Clinical Risk Groups (CRG) classification system, and construct validity through known groups and study of hierarchical clusters were examined. The analyses were carried out with the SPSS version 17 statistical package.

Results

Reliability by equivalence between observers was r = 0.97 for the clinical subscale, r = 0.74 for the community subscale, and r = 0.89 for the total score. The CCAI identified 518 cases as complex; 458 of them (88.4%) were categorized by the CRG system in the categories of greatest clinical complexity (levels 6 to 9). The results support the construct validity of the scale. The cluster analysis showed two different, although related, clusters.

Conclusion

The CCAI is a fast and easy-to-use index, with good conceptual adequacy and evidence of reliability and validity for screening patients with complex needs.

Palavras-chave : Chronic disease; Comorbidity; Patient complexity; Psychometrics; Reproducibility of results.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )