SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número54La regla de los 14 días a debate: un análisis crítico desde la bioéticaGrado de información percibida por los tutores legales en el Consentimiento Informado de pruebas de provocación en Alergia Pediátrica índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista de Bioética y Derecho

versão On-line ISSN 1886-5887

Resumo

AYELEN-FERREYRA, Karen. Ethical considerations on CRISPR/Cas9: therapeutic use in embryos and future governance. Rev. Bioética y Derecho [online]. 2022, n.54, pp.121-138.  Epub 12-Dez-2022. ISSN 1886-5887.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1344/rbd2021.54.36115.

The CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technique has made a revolution in science and has also generated discussions about its use in humans, both at the safety, ethical and political levels. In this paper, I argue that it is not possible to perform gene editing for therapeutic use of the CRISPR-Cas9 technique in embryos with monogenic diseases that will become future children until greater safety and efficacy are guaranteed. To this end, I consider that there must be a balance between prevention in its therapeutic use and its use in research. First, I explain the different possible uses of the CRISPR-Cas9 technique, differentiating its therapeutic use (validated practice and non-validated practice), its use for improvement and its use in research. Secondly, I analyze the risks of performing gene editing for therapeutic use. In addition, I list a series of ethical considerations to be considered in the future in case this technique is approved. Thirdly, I evaluate the international consensus reached so far and describe the case of Argentina, its prohibition and the problems it generates at the time of doing research. Fourthly, I analyze the different existing reproductive alternatives and perform a risk/benefit analysis for their possible use. Finally, I evaluate a possible objection to my work by explaining that it does not contemplate the reproductive freedom of prospective parents. In response, I consider that a conflict between the principles of autonomy and non-maleficence is generated.

Palavras-chave : CRISPR-Cas9; therapeutic use; single-gene diseases; risks; global consensus; future children.

        · resumo em Espanhol | Catalão     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )