SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 número4Habilidades metacognitivas en alumnos del Curso de Especialización en Medicina FamiliarActitud hacia la investigación de estudiantes universitarios en Lima, Perú índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


FEM: Revista de la Fundación Educación Médica

versão On-line ISSN 2014-9840versão impressa ISSN 2014-9832

Resumo

LOPEZ, M José et al. Teacher's conceptions on teaching and learning in health undergraduate programs. FEM (Ed. impresa) [online]. 2017, vol.20, n.4, pp.183-190.  Epub 16-Ago-2021. ISSN 2014-9840.  https://dx.doi.org/10.33588/fem.204.898.

Introduction

The conceptions of teachers influence the interpretation of educational situations and their daily pedagogical practice. Knowing them is important for planning training processes.

Aims

To describe the conceptions about the learning and the teaching that the teachers of the health careers of an university have, to establish if these conceptions have similarities with some of the classifications already described in other publications and if these teachers support conceptions close to the constructivist perspectives.

Subjects and methods

The study was performed from the perspective of phenomenology with semi-structured interviews. The sample was intentionally selected and was of 28 teachers of health careers with pedagogical training. An analysis was carried out by dimension and another one of internal consistency of each interview.

Results

On this basis, three profiles of conceptions were elaborated: teaching provider-passive student, teacher-coach-active student, and teacher-tutor-student manager.

Conclusions

The teachers interviewed, even with specific training in education, do not conceive learning as a construction process, but only as the incorporation of socially validated knowledge. But, in addition, they use terminology that comes from constructivism without being able to account for the meaning of these terms in the context of the learning theory that sustains them. In the comparison with other authors, the profiles elaborated would be closer to direct and interpretative conceptions of learning and there are no profiles in which learning is clearly defined as a process of knowledge construction.

Palavras-chave : Educational models; Psychology; Teaching; University.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )