Introduction:

We aim to describe a method that would ensure continuity of patient care as regards drug therapy at admission to the orthopaedic surgery and traumatology department, identify the reconciliation discrepancies, determine the prevalence of reconciliation errors and analyse the acceptance of the pharmacist interventions.

Methods: Prospective observational study was conducted for two years in a regional public hospital in Spain. The study included patients hospitalized in the Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department with chronic medication prescribed. At 24-48 hours after hospital admission, the pharmacist compared the pre-admission pharmacological treatment of patients with the medication received in hospital to identify and reconciliation discrepancies. They were communicated and we analysed the acceptance of the pharmacist interventions.

Results:

The study included 756 patients, with a total of 834 hospitalization episodes, 66,1% of whom were women, mean age: 72±12,3 years and a mean of 8,1±4,3 drugs. We analysed 8422 prescriptions, 57,5% reconciliation discrepancies. The most frequent unjustified discrepancies were drug omission (75,2%), following by modification of the dose or route of administration (19,1%). There was at least one medication reconciliation discrepancy in 87,4% of hospitalization episodes. Pharmacist recommendations were accepted in 69,9% of cases.

Conclusions:

There was a high prevalence of reconciliation errors among patients admitted to the Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department.

This methodology has allowed a workflow to be established that facilitates coordination between the pharmacist and others healthcare providers, to identify and resolve medication discrepancies to reduce medication errors.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )