Meu SciELO
Serviços Personalizados
Journal
Artigo
Indicadores
- Citado por SciELO
- Acessos
Links relacionados
- Citado por Google
- Similares em SciELO
- Similares em Google
Compartilhar
Enfermería Nefrológica
versão On-line ISSN 2255-3517versão impressa ISSN 2254-2884
Resumo
PELAYO-ALONSO, Raquel et al. Extended hemodialysis versus conventional or online hemodiafiltration. Comparative study of the need for heparin and coagulation of the system. Enferm Nefrol [online]. 2021, vol.24, n.3, pp.272-277. Epub 08-Nov-2021. ISSN 2255-3517. https://dx.doi.org/10.37551/s2254-28842021024.
Introduction:
The recent emergence of medium-cut membranes offers an alternative for the removal of medium-sized molecules and new dialytic therapy, expanded hemodialysis. These membranes are characterised by a larger pore size that could affect the removal of heparin used during hemodialysis sessions.
Objective:
To determine whether there are differences in the need for heparin and the coagulation status of the system and dialyser according to dialysis technique.
Material and Method:
Quasi-experimental study in hemodialysis patients with two study periods, in the first, the patient received conventional hemodialysis or hemodiafiltration and in the second, expanded hemodialysis with medium-cut membranes.
Results:
The dialyser was partially clotted in 10.3% of expanded hemodialysis sessions compared to 19.1% of conventional hemodialysis sessions and 11.4% of haemodiafiltration sessions (p=0.011).
Conclusions:
Expanded hemodialysis offers better final coagulation status of the system and dialyser than other membranes.
Palavras-chave : expanded hemodialysis; medium cut-off membrane; anticoagulants; heparin.